Case Report
Infection-Induced Elevated Plasma Perampanel in a Patient with Hemimegalencephaly
Table 2
Evaluation of the causal relationship between perampanel and impaired consciousness using the Naranjo scale.
| | Yes | No | Do not know | Score |
| 1. Are there previous conclusive reports on this reaction? | +1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 2. Did the adverse event appear after the suspected drug was administered? | +2 | −1 | 0 | +2 | 3. Did the adverse reaction improve when the drug was discontinued or a specific antagonist was administered? | +1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 4. Did the adverse reaction reappear when the drug was readministered? | +2 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 5. Are there alternative causes (other than the drug) that could on their own have caused the reaction? | −1 | +2 | 0 | +2 | 6. Did the reaction reappear when a placebo was given? | −1 | +1 | 0 | 0 | 7. Was the drug detected in blood (or other fluids) in concentration known to be toxic? | +1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 8. Was the reaction more severe when the dose was increased or less severe when the dose was decreased? | +1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9. Did the patient have a similar reaction to the same or similar drugs in any previous exposure? | +1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10. Was the adverse event confirmed by any objective evidence? | +1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | | | Total score | +7 |
|
|
Total score ≥9, definite ADR; 5–8, probable ADR; 1–4, possible ADR; 0, doubtful ADR. ADR, adverse drug reaction.
|