Research Article

Anti-Myxovirus Resistance Protein-1 Immunoglobulin A Autoantibody in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Table 7

Cox proportional hazard regression analysis to predict acute exacerbation in IPF.

ParametersHR95% CI value

Univariate analysis
 Gender, male vs. female1.0740.364–3.1660.897
 Age1.0420.983–1.1040.165
 Smoking, y/n0.7830.249–2.1820.583
 Diagnosis of IPF, clinical vs. SLB1.5830.689–3.6330.279
 BMI1.0110.884–1.1560.870
 mMRC, 2≤ vs. <24.7862.024–11.316<0.001
 %FVC0.9550.932–0.978<0.001
 %DLco0.9710.946–0.9960.025
 Neutrophils in BAL, %1.0861.009–1.1680.028
 Lymphocytes in BAL, %0.9970.949–1.0470.901
 GAP stage, II vs. I7.6712.750–21.399<0.001
 GAP stage, III vs. I5.9280.642–57.7440.117
 KL-6, x100 U/mL1.0641.024–1.1060.002
 SP-D, x10 ng/mL1.0171.001–1.0340.043
 HRCT pattern
 Possible UIP vs. UIP0.9720.385–2.4530.951
 Inconsistent with UIP vs. UIP2.5000.559–11.1790.231
Multivariate analysis
 mMRC, 2≤ vs. <23.0761.202–7.8700.019
 %FVC0.9650.939–0.9920.012

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; BMI, body mass index; mMRC, modified Medical Research Council score for shortness of breath; %FVC, percent predicted value of forced vital capacity; %DLco, percent predicted value of diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide; GAP stage, gender, age, and physiology stage; KL-6, Krebs von den Lungen-6; SP-D, surfactant protein; HRCT, high-resolution computed tomography; UIP, usual interstitial pneumonia. Significance of each parameter to predict occurrence of acute exacerbation in IPF was evaluated by univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Multivariate analysis with the stepwise method was performed using all significant parameters except for GAP stage, KL-6, and SP-D to clarify predictive factors specific for our cases other than GAP stage. HRs of %FVC and %DLco less than 1 suggests patients with higher %FVC and higher %DLco experience less occurrence of acute exacerbation.