“Traditional” and “Healthy” Dietary Patterns Are Associated with Low Cardiometabolic Risk in Brazilian Subjects
Table 5
Poisson regression for association of cardiometabolic risk factors (dependent variables) with positive factor score∗ of dietary patterns (independent variables) in cardiometabolic risk subjects (n = 295), Brazil, 2017.
Cardiometabolic risk factors
Traditional
Healthy
Adjusted model1
Adjusted model1
PR (CI 95%)
PR (CI 95%)
Overweight
0.85 (0.74–0.99)
0.043
0.88 (0.68–1.14)
0.363
Abdominal obesity
0.19 (0.03–0.96)
0.045
0.13 (0.02–0.76)
0.024
High WHR
0.05 (0.01–0.19)
<0.001
0.03 (0.00–0.22)
<0.001
High WHtR
0.20 (0.04–0.99)
0.045
0.14 (0.02–0.81)
0.028
Excessive body fat
0.68 (0.34–1.35)
0.274
0.71 (0.37–1.35)
0.304
High LDL/HDL ratio
0.86 (0.75–0.99)
0.041
1.46 (0.61–3.48)
0.387
High Uric acid
0.97 (0.57–1.63)
0.923
1.07 (0.68–1.69)
0.756
High CRP
1.16 (0.88–1.52)
0.278
0.91 (0.65–1.26)
0.595
Dyslipidemias
0.06 (0.02–0.51)
0.009
0.03 (0.01–0.27)
0.001
Diabetes
0.05 (0.01–0.45)
0.007
0.02 (0.01–0.18)
<0.001
Hypertension
0.06 (0.02–0.50)
0.009
0.02 (0.01–0.21)
0.001
∗Positive factor score = higher adherence to the dietary pattern. 1 Model adjusted for age, education, physical activity, and alcoholism. PR = prevalence ratio; 95% CI = confidence interval 95%.