Research Article

Childhood Neglect rather than Abuse Is More Strongly Associated with Anhedonia across Major Depression and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Patients and University Students

Table 5

Specific types of CT prediction of different aspects of anhedonia in MDD and OCD patients.

PredictorsVariable statisticsModel statistics
(s.e.)

MDD patients
 TEPS-ANT
  Step 1: covariates0.052.790.012
  Step 2: EN-2.52 (0.11)-0.14-2.340.0200.023.210.003
     PN (ex)-0.800.425
 TEPS-CON
  Step 1: covariates0.063.120.006
  Step 2: EN-0.22 (0.09)-0.14-2.440.0150.023.570.001
     PN (ex)-0.360.718
 PAS
  Step 1: covariates0.179.92<0.001
  Step 2: EN0.42 (0.12)0.193.60<0.0010.0410.68<0.001
     PN (ex)0.6860.493
 SAS
  Step 1: covariates0.116.03<0.001
  Step 2: PN0.36 (0.12)0.183.140.0020.046.73<0.001
     EN (ex)1.580.114
     EA (ex)0.370.172
 SHAPS ()
  Step 1: covariates0.173.360.005
  Step 2: EN2.67 (0.11)0.232.480.0150.053.920.001
     PN (ex)0.900.093
OCD patients
 TEPS-ANT
  Step 1: covariates0.112.430.022
  Step 2: EN-0.40 (0.15)-0.22-2.670.0080.043.110.003
 SHAPS ()
  Step 1: covariates0.293.440.004
  Step 2: PN0.55 (0.23)0.272.440.0180.074.010.001
     EN (ex)0.750.455

OCD: obsessive-compulsive disorder; MDD: major depression disorder; TEPS_ANT: anticipatory pleasure subscale of Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale; TEPS_CON: consummatory pleasure subscale of TEPS; PAS: Physical Anhedonia Scale; SAS: Social Anhedonia Scale; SHAPS: Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale; CT: childhood trauma; EN: emotional neglect; PN: physical neglect; ex: excluded from the regression model. Significant predictors were shown in bold values.