Research Article

Childhood Neglect rather than Abuse Is More Strongly Associated with Anhedonia across Major Depression and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Patients and University Students

Table 6

Specific types of CT prediction of different aspects of anhedonia in university students.

PredictorsVariable statisticsModel statistics
(s.e.)

University students
 TEPS-ANT
  Step 1: covariates0.0935.63<0.001
  Step 2: EN-0.36 (0.05)-0.17-7.74<0.0010.0339.97<0.001
     PN (ex)0.860.770
     PA (ex)0.860.390
 TEPS-CON
  Step 1: covariates0.0726.71<0.001
  Step 2: EN-0.20 (0.04)-0.10-4.61<0.0010.0126.16<0.001
     PN (ex)-1.490.136
     PA (ex)0.410.679
 PAS
  Step 1: covariates0.1142.88<0.001
  Step 2: EN0.20 (0.04)0.104.66<0.0010.0140.22<0.001
     PN (ex)1.370.172
     PA (ex)0.790.428
     EA (ex)-0.030.973
     SA (ex)-0.590.553
 SAS
  Step 1: covariates0.1457.46<0.001
  Step 2: EN0.20 (0.04)0.135.67<0.0010.0353.68<0.001
     EA0.27 (0.07)0.094.10<0.001
     PA (ex)0.130.897
     PN (ex)0.390.698
     SA (ex)0.370.714
 SHAPS
  Step 1: covariates0.1454.83<0.001
  Step 2: EN0.22 (0.03)0.146.54<0.0010.0254.03<0.001
     PN (ex)1.400.161
     PA (ex)-0.010.990
     EA (ex)0.990.322
     SA (ex)0.750.452

TEPS_ANT: anticipatory pleasure subscale of Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale; TEPS_CON: consummatory pleasure subscale of TEPS; PAS: Physical Anhedonia Scale; SAS: Social Anhedonia Scale; SHAPS: Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale; CT: childhood trauma; EN: emotional neglect; PN: physical neglect; EA: emotional abuse; PA: physical abuse; SA: sexual abuse; ex: excluded from the regression model. Significant predictors were shown in bold values.