Research Article
The Factors of Adolescent Depression in Jiangsu Province, China, from the Perspective of Social Ecosystem: A Case-Control Study
Table 2
Comparison of core self-evaluation, social support, family function, and resilience scale between the two groups (
) (
,,
(%)).
| Variable | Case () | Control () | | |
| Core self-evaluation | | | 13.017 | ≤0.001 | Low-score group | 77 (77.0%) | 13 (13.0%) | 82.747 | ≤0.001 | High-score group | 23 (23.0%) | 87 (87.0%) | Adolescent social support | | | 8.637 | ≤0.001 | Low-score group | 63 (63.0%) | 14 (14.0%) | 50.702 | ≤0.001 | High-score group | 37 (37.0%) | 86 (86.0%) | Psychological resilience | | | 8.423 | ≤0.001 | Low-score group | 80 (80.0%) | 18 (18.0%) | 76.911 | ≤0.001 | High-score group | 20 (20.0%) | 82 (82.0%) | Family function | | | 6.976 | ≤0.001 | Severe family dysfunction | 28 (28.0%) | 4 (4.0%) | 37.093 | ≤0.001 | Moderate family dysfunction | 44 (44.0%) | 29 (29.0%) | Good family function | 28 (28.0%) | 67 (67.0%) |
|
|