Research Article
The Factors of Adolescent Depression in Jiangsu Province, China, from the Perspective of Social Ecosystem: A Case-Control Study
Table 3
Univariate and multivariate analyses of adolescent depression.
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | COR | 95% (CI) | | Wald | AOR | 95% (CI) | |
| Constant | | | | 24.861 | 0.045 | | <0.001 | Only child | No★ | | | | | | | | Yes | 2.793 | 1.573-4.962 | <0.001 | 4.768 | 2.680 | 1.106-6.492 | 0.029 | Place of residence | Place: rural areas★ | | | | | | | | Place: urban areas | 2.549 | 1.2448-5.220 | 0.011 | 4.360 | 3.324 | 1.077-10.267 | 0.037 | Place: town | 0.988 | 0.427-2.288 | 0.978 | 0.114 | 1.247 | 0.346-4.493 | 0.736 | School bullying | No★ | | | | | | | | Yes | 12.923 | 4.383-38.104 | <0.001 | 8.403 | 9.087 | 2.044-40.408 | 0.004 | Relationships with parents | Good★ | | | | | | | | Average | 9.771 | 4.064-23.491 | <0.001 | 2.499 | 3.147 | 0.760-13.036 | 0.114 | Bad | 7.200 | 1.940-26.725 | 0.003 | 0.422 | 0.470 | 0.048-4.593 | 0.516 | Relationships with classmates | Good★ | | | | | | | | Average | 6.633 | 3.191-13.787 | <0.001 | 1.858 | 2.272 | 0.698-7.398 | 0.173 | Bad | 18.511 | 2.299-149.063 | 0.006 | 0.831 | 3.290 | 0.254-42.568 | 0.362 | Adolescent core self-evaluation | High-score group★ | | | | | | | | Low-score group | 22.404 | 10.625-47.242 | <0.001 | 14.496 | 11.746 | 3.305-41.746 | <0.001 | Family function | Good family function★ | | | | | | | | Moderate family dysfunction | 3.631 | 1.907-6.911 | <0.001 | 0.194 | 0.764 | 0.231-2.530 | 0.659 | Severe family dysfunction | 16.750 | 5.375-52.200 | <0.001 | 4.304 | 6.491 | 1.109-37.995 | 0.038 | Adolescent social support | High-score group★ | | | | | | | | Low-score group | 10.459 | 5.217-20.970 | <0.001 | 0.000 | 0.990 | 0.273-3.584 | 0.988 | Psychological resilience | High-score group★ | | | | | | | | Low-score group | 18.222 | 8.983-36.966 | <0.001 | 0.046 | 1.162 | 0.297-4.551 | 0.830 |
|
|
★Reference.
|