Review Article

Prevalence of Postpartum Depression Based on Diagnostic Interviews: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Subgroup analysis of prevalence of postpartum depression (PPD).

SubgroupAll depressionMajor depression
Number of studiesPooled prevalence (95% CI) valueNumber of studiesPooled prevalence (95% CI) value

Quality evaluation
 Low-quality2512.2% (9.3%; 15.4%)0.81177.6% (5.1%; 10.5%)0.41
 Moderate- and high-quality2911.9% (9.7%; 14.3%)176.6% (5.2%; 8.1%)
Primary purpose of research
 To study prevalence of PPD2010.3% (7.5%; 13.5%)0.14146.9% (4.7%; 9.5%)0.93
 Others3413.2% (10.9%; 15.8%)207.0% (5.2%; 9.0%)
Type of study
 Cohort2711.0% (8.9%; 13.2%)0.25166.8% (4.4%; 9.6%)0.82
 Cross-sectional2713.2% (10.4%; 16.3%)187.0% (5.4%; 8.8%)
Country/region income level
 High-income3310.9% (9.0%; 13.0%)0.15256.2% (4.7%; 7.8%)0.04
 Low- and middle-income2113.9% (10.7%; .17.4%)99.2% (6.9%; 11.7%)
Recruiting site0.98
 Medical institution4612.1% (10.2%; 14.0%)0.91297.0% (5.7%; 8.4%)
 Nonmedical institution812.4% (6.5%; 19.8%)56.8% (2.3%; 13.4%)
Setting for the interview
 Medical institution2412.6% (10.0%; 15.5%)0.52137.4% (5.0%; 10.1%)0.87
 Others2611.3% (9.1%; 13.6%)187.0% (5.3%; 8.8%)
Professional background of interviewers
 Mental Health professional2912.8% (10.6%; 15.2%)0.28187.8% (6.4%; 9.4%)0.10
 Lay interviewers1410.2% (6.6%; 14.4%)105.3% (3.3%; 7.7%)
Interview protocol
 Semistructured interview3711.6% (9.6%; 13.8%)0.70256.8% (5.4%; 8.3%)0.77
 Structured interview1412.6% (9.0%; 16.7%)87.5% (4.3%; 11.4%)
Diagnostic criteria
 DSMa3311.2% (8.9%; 13.7%)0.24236.6% (5.2%; 8.1%)<0.01
 ICDb715.3% (11.6%; 19.4%)115.2% (11.9%; 19.1%)
 RDCc811.2% (7.2%; 15.9%)65.1% (2.9%; 7.9%)
Mode of interviews
 Face-to-face4412.3% (10.4%; 14.3%)0.24267.7% (6.1%; 9.4%)0.08
 Telephone78.7% (5.3%; 12.8%)64.9% (2.9%; 7.4%)

Note: a: diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders; b: international classification of diseases; c: research diagnostic criteria.