Research Article
Towards the Coupling Coordination Relationship between Economic Growth Quality and Environmental Regulation: An Empirical Case Study of China
Table 1
The indicator system of the CCD.
| | Subsystem | Criteria | Indicator | Unit | Index type | Weight |
| | EGQ | Stability | Year-on-year GDP growth rate | % | + | 0.1190 | | Price fluctuation | — | − | 0.1186 | | The unemployment rate | % | − | 0.1185 | | Efficiency | Labor productivity | Yuan/person | + | 0.1094 | | Ratio of technology transaction volume to GDP | % | + | 0.0733 | | Capital productivity | % | + | 0.1113 | | Direct benefit | Engel coefficient | % | − | 0.1161 | | Theil index | — | − | 0.1176 | | Labor compensation as a share of GDP | % | + | 0.1162 |
| | ER | Intensity | Number of environmental personnel | Person | + | 0.1104 | | The proportion of wastewater treatment investment | % | + | 0.0998 | | The proportion of waste gas treatment investment | % | + | 0.1026 | | Pressure | Wastewater discharge per unit of output | Tons/ten thousand yuan | − | 0.1180 | | Unit sulphur dioxide emissions | Tons/one hundred million yuan | − | 0.1183 | | Solid waste per unit of output | Tons/ten thousand yuan | − | 0.1184 | | Performance | Green area per capital | M2/person | + | 0.1136 | | Household garbage harmless disposal rate | % | + | 0.1154 | | Urban sewage daily treatment capacity | Thousands of cubic meters | + | 0.1035 |
|
|