Research Article
[Retracted] Psychological Contracts and Employee Innovative Behaviours: A Moderated Mediation Effect Model
Table 3
Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations.
| | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 1. Gender | 1.620 | .486 | | | | | | | | | | 2. Age | 2.050 | .766 | −0.07 | | | | | | | | | 3. Marital status | 1.380 | .487 | −0.019 | −0.600 | | | | | | | | 4. Education background | 1.740 | .618 | −0.244 | 0.059 | −0.001 | | | | | | | 5. Organizational tenure | 1.800 | .832 | −0.117 | 0.658 | −0.509 | 0.033 | | | | | | 6. Psychological contract | 3.552 | .616 | 0.134 | −0.047 | −0.003 | −0.072 | −0.058 | (0.755) | | | | 7. Embedding strength | 3.868 | .801 | 0.057 | −0.016 | −0.107 | 0.034 | −0.033 | 0.527 | (0.728) | | | 8. Embedding quality | 4.099 | .730 | 0.150 | 0.043 | −0.095 | 0.017 | −0.031 | 0.348 | 0.644 | (0.794) | | 9. Employee innovative behaviour | 3.830 | .715 | 0.058 | 0.041 | −0.027 | 0.042 | 0.005 | 0.501 | 0.565 | 0.537 | (0.746) |
|
|