[Retracted] Psychological Contracts and Employee Innovative Behaviours: A Moderated Mediation Effect Model

Table 4

The test of intermediary effect.

	Point estimation	Product of coeff.		Bias-corrected 95% CI		Percentile 95% CI
		SE	Z	Lower	Upper	Lower	Upper
Psychological contract ⟶ embedding strength	1.782	0.390	4.569	1.235	2.731	1.225	2.716
Psychological contract ⟶ embedding quality	1.142	0.273	4.183	0.748	1.839	0.731	1.785
Embedding strength ⟶ employee innovative behaviour	0.270	0.085	3.176	0.116	0.445	0.120	0.451
Embedding quality ⟶ employee innovative behaviour	0.339	0.092	3.685	0.164	0.524	0.170	0.530
Psychological contract ⟶ employee innovative behaviour	0.865	0.296	2.922	0.410	1.615	0.379	1.545
Psychological contract ⟶ embedding strength ⟶ employee innovative behaviour	0.481	0.198	2.429	0.193	0.965	0.196	0.970
Psychological contract ⟶ embedding quality ⟶ employee innovative behaviour	0.387	0.135	2.867	0.178	0.700	0.177	0.694
Total indirect effect	0.868	0.270	3.215	0.461	1.494	0.466	1.505
Total effect	1.733	0.352	4.923	1.283	2.700	1.256	2.621
Comparison of mediating effects between embedding strength and embedding quality	−0.094	0.205	−0.459	−0.548	0.279	−0.565	0.269

Note: 5,000 bootstrap samples.