Research Article

Could Executive Compensation Incentive Enhance the Efficiency of Enterprise Resource Allocation? An Empirical Study from China

Table 5

Full sample regression analysis results of executive incentive compensation and resource allocation efficiency.

VariablesModel (1)Model (2)Model (3)Model (4)

Pay0.0297 (4.09)0.0457 (6.91)
Stock0.0014 (2.06)0.0022 (3.26)
Consumption1.8184 (4.83)4.2789 (4.52)
Consumption2−30.9191 (−1.98)
Cash0.0266 (0.66)0.0321 (0.80)0.0556 (1.38)0.0390 (0.97)
Lever0.0542 (2.29)0.0740 (3.19)0.1013 (4.39)0.0502 (2.11)
Growth0.0495 (4.10)0.0501 (4.13)0.0531 (4.37)0.0510 (4.22)
Firmage−0.0013 (−1.61)−0.0018 (−2.22)−0.0011 (−1.33)−0.0011 (−1.43)
First−0.00001 (−0.05)−0.0001 (−0.48)0.00005 (0.17)−.0001 (−0.31)
Owner−0.0206 (−2.00)−0.0176 (−1.83)−0.0225 (−2.19)−0.0071 (−0.74)
Mtenure−0.0002 (−1.12)−0.0001 (−0.80)−0.0002 (−1.18)−0.0002 (−1.14)
Mage0.0034 (2.58)0.0038 (2.93)0.0047 (3.63)0.0035 (2.68)
Meducation0.0050 (0.67)0.0087 (1.18)0.0222 (3.14)0.0096 (1.33)
YearYesYesYesYes
Constant term−0.6189 (−5.42)−0.8719 (−8.45)−0.3321 (−4.80)−0.2392 (−3.32)
Adjusted R20.03300.02700.01890.0291
F11.1310.537.6210.55
Sample size4460446044604460

, , and indicate that the variable is significant at the significance levels of 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively, and the t value is in parentheses.