Research Article
Sustainable Growth from a Factor Dependence and Technological Progress Perspective: A Case Study of East China
Table 2
Output elasticity of secondary industry.
| | Regional growth | K | H1 | H2 | H3 | E | T | Technology progress | Adj. R2\D. W. |
| | Shanghai −1.50% | Factor resilience | −0.121 | | | | 1.055 | | | 0.920 | | (−2.970) | (24.148) | \1.608 | | Factor increase | 13.79% | | | | 4.32% | | | | | Growth contribution | −1.66% | | | | 4.56% | | 0.66% | | | Contribution share | −46.76% | | | | 128.22% | | 18.54% | |
| | Jiangsu 6.10% | Factor resilience | 0.143 | 0.202 | | −0.051 | 0.644 | 0.073 | | 0.998 | | (3.423) | (2.782) | (−2.766) | (6.129) | (6.612) | \2.310 | | Factor increase | 26.44% | −2.06% | | 23.07% | 8.33% | 19.24% | | | | Growth contribution | 3.77% | −0.42% | | −1.18% | 5.36% | 1.40% | −0.20% | | | Contribution share | 43.14% | −4.76% | | −13.54% | 61.40% | 16.07% | −2.31% | |
| | Zhejiang 3.60% | Factor resilience | 0.135 | | | | 0.803 | | | 0.997 | | (17.632) | (96.165) | \1.664 | | Factor increase | 24.53% | | | | 5.75% | | | | | Growth contribution | 3.32% | | | | 4.62% | | −0.34% | | | Contribution share | 43.71% | | | | 60.79% | | −4.51% | |
| | Anhui 5.26% | Factor resilience | | −1.258 | 0.851 | 0.109 | 1.128 | | | 0.994 | | (−11.607) | (4.371) | (2.577) | (10.235) | \2.005 | | Factor increase | | −2.83% | 0.97% | 14.64% | 7.18% | | | | | Growth contribution | | 3.56% | 0.82% | 1.59% | 8.10% | | −1.15% | | | Contribution share | | 27.54% | 6.38% | 12.33% | 62.65% | | −8.90% | |
| | Fujian 5.37% | Factor resilience | 0.380 | | 0.580 | 0.078 | | | | 0.994 | | (24.071) | (26.638) | (2.751) | \1.143 | | Factor increase | 25.91% | | 2.09% | 22.35% | | | | | | Growth contribution | 9.84% | | 1.21% | 1.75% | | | −2.10% | | | Contribution share | 91.95% | | 11.33% | 16.32% | | | −19.60% | |
| | Jiangxi 4.40% | Factor resilience | 0.130 | −0.341 | | | 1.069 | | | 0.994 | | (2.647) | (−3.121) | (7.403) | \1.338 | | Factor increase | 35.79% | −1.24% | | | 7.78% | | | | | Growth contribution | 4.69% | 0.42% | | | 8.33% | | −0.48% | | | Contribution share | 36.19% | 3.26% | | | 64.28% | | −3.73% | |
| | Shandong 5.82% | Factor resilience | 0.323 | 0.564 | 0.194 | | | | | 0.991 | | (20.887) | (6.295) | (1.983) | \1.499 | | Factor increase | 29.28% | −0.87% | 1.88% | | | | | | | Growth contribution | 9.46% | −0.49% | 0.36% | | | | −1.32% | | | Contribution share | 117.97% | −6.08% | 4.53% | | | | −16.41% | |
|
|
Note. The interpreted variable is lnG2. , , and are, respectively, significant at 10, 5, and 1 percent levels. The T value is in parentheses. |
