Research Article
[Retracted] Can Limits to Arbitrage Explain Stock Price Idiosyncratic Volatility Premium Puzzle in China’s A-Share Market?
Table 5
Return differences between extreme IVOLi,t−1 portfolios within different portfolios sorts by individual limits to arbitrage measure.
| | Panel A: equally weighted extreme portfolios’ mean return differences | | Individual limits to arbitrage measures | AMHi,t | PLNi,t | MSTi,t |
| | Level of limits to arbitrage | Returns | P1–P10 | t-statistics | P1–P10 | t-statistics | P1–P10 | t-statistics | | Lowest | Ri,t | 0.85 | 4.14 | 0.51 | 2.97 | 1.45 | 5.58 | | ARi,t | 1.05 | 7.09 | 0.68 | 5.41 | 1.74 | 8.14 | | Middle | Ri,t | 1.44 | 7.12 | 1.34 | 6.42 | | | | ARi,t | 1.46 | 9.83 | 1.31 | 8.42 | | | | Highest | Ri,t | 2.37 | 11.77 | 2.43 | 10.63 | 2.60 | 5.26 | | ARi,t | 2.54 | 16.11 | 2.39 | 14.05 | 3.04 | 8.18 |
| | Panel B: market value equally weighted extreme portfolios’ mean return differences | | Individual limits to arbitrage measures | AMHi,t | PLNi,t | MSTi,t | | Level of limits to arbitrage | Returns | P1–P10 | t-statistics | P1–P10 | t-statistics | P1–P10 | t-statistics |
| | Lowest | Ri,t | −1.30 | −5.77 | −0.44 | −2.76 | −0.15 | −0.52 | | ARi,t | 0.26 | 1.56 | 0.29 | 2.22 | 1.09 | 4.41 | | Middle | Ri,t | −0.60 | −2.80 | 0.90 | 3.96 | | | | ARi,t | 0.71 | 4.33 | 0.78 | 4.29 | | | | Highest | Ri,t | 1.49 | 7.05 | 2.68 | 10.57 | 0.51 | 0.89 | | ARi,t | 3.25 | 18.25 | 2.53 | 12.77 | 5.12 | 11.53 |
|
|