An Analysis of the Long-Term Sustainability of the Large Companies Included in the Original Standard and Poor’s 500 Index

Table 5

This truth table shows the results obtained in the fuzzy sets analysis. In the table, the value 0 means no involvement of that variable in the explanation of the long-term sustainability of the company. On the contrary, the value 1 means relevance. And ? symbol means that nothing can be determined.

EE		AA	UU	FF	D	T	Out	n	Incl	EE		AA	UU	FF	D	T	Out	n	Incl
1	0	0	0	0	0	0	?	0	—	65	1	0	0	0	0	0	?	0	—
2	0	0	0	0	0	0	?	0	—	66	1	0	0	0	0	0	?	0	—
3	0	0	0	0	0	1	?	0	—	67	1	0	0	0	0	1	?	0	—
4	0	0	0	0	0	1	?	0	—	68	1	0	0	0	0	1	?	0	—
5	0	0	0	0	1	0	?	0	—	69	1	0	0	0	1	0	?	0	—
6	0	0	0	0	1	0	?	0	—	70	1	0	0	0	1	0	?	0	—
7	0	0	0	0	1	1	?	0	—	71	1	0	0	0	1	1	?	0	—
8	0	0	0	0	1	1	?	0	—	72	1	0	0	0	1	1	?	0	—
9	0	0	0	1	0	0	?	0	—	73	1	0	0	1	0	0	?	0	—
10	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0.333	74	1	0	0	1	0	0	?	0	—
11	0	0	0	1	0	1	?	0	—	75	1	0	0	1	0	1	?	0	—
12	0	0	0	1	0	1	?	0	—	76	1	0	0	1	0	1	?	0	—
13	0	0	0	1	1	0	?	0	—	77	1	0	0	1	1	0	?	0	—
14	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	2	0.219	78	1	0	0	1	1	0	?	0	—
15	0	0	0	1	1	1	?	0	—	79	1	0	0	1	1	1	?	0	—
16	0	0	0	1	1	1	0	3	0.348	80	1	0	0	1	1	1	?	0	—
17	0	0	1	0	0	0	?	0	—	81	1	0	1	0	0	0	?	0	—
18	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	2	0.342	82	1	0	1	0	0	0	?	0	—
19	0	0	1	0	0	1	?	0	—	83	1	0	1	0	0	1	?	0	—
20	0	0	1	0	0	1	?	0	—	84	1	0	1	0	0	1	?	0	—
21	0	0	1	0	1	0	?	0	—	85	1	0	1	0	1	0	?	0	—
22	0	0	1	0	1	0	?	0	—	86	1	0	1	0	1	0	?	0	—
23	0	0	1	0	1	1	?	0	—	87	1	0	1	0	1	1	?	0	—
24	0	0	1	0	1	1	?	0	—	88	1	0	1	0	1	1	?	0	—
25	0	0	1	1	0	0	?	0	—	89	1	0	1	1	0	0	?	0	—
26	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	2	0.486	90	1	0	1	1	0	0	?	0	—
27	0	0	1	1	0	1	?	0	—	91	1	0	1	1	0	1	?	0	—
28	0	0	1	1	0	1	?	0	—	92	1	0	1	1	0	1	?	0	—
29	0	0	1	1	1	0	?	0	—	93	1	0	1	1	1	0	1	1	0.954
30	0	0	1	1	1	0	0	5	0.368	94	1	0	1	1	1	0	?	0	—
31	0	0	1	1	1	1	0	1	0.267	95	1	0	1	1	1	1	?	0	—
32	0	0	1	1	1	1	0	5	0.368	96	1	0	1	1	1	1	?	0	—
33	0	1	0	0	0	0	?	0	—	97	1	1	0	0	0	0	?	0	—
34	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.288	98	1	1	0	0	0	0	?	0	—
35	0	1	0	0	0	1	?	0	—	99	1	1	0	0	0	1	?	0	—
36	0	1	0	0	0	1	?	0	—	100	1	1	0	0	0	1	?	0	—
37	0	1	0	0	1	0	?	0	—	101	1	1	0	0	1	0	?	0	—
38	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	2	0.398	102	1	1	0	0	1	0	?	0	—
39	0	1	0	0	1	1	?	0	—	103	1	1	0	0	1	1	?	0	—
40	0	1	0	0	1	1	0	1	0.416	104	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	2	0.898
41	0	1	0	1	0	0	?	0	—	105	1	1	0	1	0	0	?	0	—
42	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	2	0.264	106	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	2	0.517
43	0	1	0	1	0	1	?	0	—	107	1	1	0	1	0	1	?	0	—
44	0	1	0	1	0	1	?	0	—	108	1	1	0	1	0	1	?	0	—
45	0	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	0.448	109	1	1	0	1	1	0	?	0	—
46	0	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	0.314	110	1	1	0	1	1	0	?	0	—
47	0	1	0	1	1	1	?	0	—	111	1	1	0	1	1	1	?	0	—
48	0	1	0	1	1	1	0	2	0.296	112	1	1	0	1	1	1	?	0	—
49	0	1	1	0	0	0	?	0	—	113	1	1	1	0	0	0	?	0	—
50	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	3	0.474	114	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0.602
51	0	1	1	0	0	1	?	0	—	115	1	1	1	0	0	1	?	0	—
52	0	1	1	0	0	1	?	0	—	116	1	1	1	0	0	1	?	0	—
53	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	1	0.335	117	1	1	1	0	1	0	?	0	—
54	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	1	0.496	118	1	1	1	0	1	0	0	1	0.579
55	0	1	1	0	1	1	0	2	0.253	119	1	1	1	0	1	1	?	0	—
56	0	1	1	0	1	1	0	1	0.508	120	1	1	1	0	1	1	?	0	—
57	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	1	0.470	121	1	1	1	1	0	0	?	0	—
58	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	2	0.640	122	1	1	1	1	0	0	1	4	0.997
59	0	1	1	1	0	1	?	0	—	123	1	1	1	1	0	1	?	0	—
60	0	1	1	1	0	1	?	0	—	124	1	1	1	1	0	1	?	0	—
61	0	1	1	1	1	0	0	2	0.477	125	1	1	1	1	1	0	?	0	—
62	0	1	1	1	1	0	0	13	0.528	126	1	1	1	1	1	0	1	6	0.724
63	0	1	1	1	1	1	?	0	—	127	1	1	1	1	1	1	?	0	—
64	0	1	1	1	1	1	0	13	0.500	128	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	7	0.926

EE: improvements in the variable effectiveness (dynamic), AA: improvements in the variable organisation (dynamic), UU: improvements in the variable coherence (dynamic), FF: improvements in the variable formalisation (dynamic), T: presence of the variable competitiveness (static), D: presence of the variable dynamism (static), Out: outcome value, n: number of companies responding to that configuration, incl: sufficiency inclusion score, Truth table: > dTT1<-truthTable (fort500, outcome = “P,” conditions = c(“EE,” “AA,” “UU,” “FF,” “D,” “T”)+ n.cut = 1, incl.cut1 = 0.65, complete = TRUE).