Research Article
Performance Evaluation of China's Basic Pension Insurance Based on a Three-Stage Superefficient SBM-DEA Model
Table 1
Performance evaluation values of the national average workers' basic pension insurance system.
| ā | Beijing | Tianjin | Hebei | Shanxi | Neimenggu | Liaoning | Jilin | Heilongjiang |
| 2016 | 0.3882 | 0.3904 | 0.6605 | 0.5085 | 0.6855 | 0.3420 | 0.3935 | 0.2765 | 2017 | 0.4006 | 0.3896 | 0.5871 | 0.4662 | 0.5933 | 0.3650 | 0.3620 | 0.2462 | 2018 | 0.4415 | 0.3642 | 0.5498 | 0.4425 | 0.5106 | 0.3254 | 0.3244 | 0.2336 | 2019 | 0.4324 | 0.3599 | 0.5117 | 0.4109 | 0.4527 | 0.3006 | 0.3006 | 0.2195 | 2020 | 0.4328 | 0.3351 | 0.4590 | 0.3782 | 0.3913 | 0.2604 | 0.2604 | 0.1910 | Average | 0.4155 | 0.3678 | 0.5536 | 0.4413 | 0.5267 | 0.3282 | 0.3282 | 0.2334 |
|
|