Research Article
Promoting Variable Effect Consistency in Mixture Cure Model for Credit Scoring
Table 4
Results of the estimation performance in Example 2.
| | | | | | | Full | MCG | MCGS | Full | MCG | MCGS | Full | MCG | MCGS |
| 0.25 | 60 | MSE | 0.35 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.09 | 0.05 | (0.13) | (0.03) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.08) | (0.02) | (0.01) | TPR | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | | (0.00) | (0.00) | | (0.00) | (0.00) | | (0.00) | (0.00) | FPR | — | 0.37 | 0.08 | — | 0.76 | 0.12 | — | 0.57 | 0.10 | | (0.24) | (0.06) | | (0.09) | (0.07) | | (0.13) | (0.06) | 200 | MSE | 20.24 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.68 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 12.70 | 0.16 | 0.06 | (4.57) | (0.05) | (0.02) | (0.12) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (2.81) | (0.03) | (0.01) | TPR | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | | (0.00) | (0.00) | | (0.00) | (0.00) | | (0.00) | (0.00) | FPR | — | 0.02 | 0.04 | — | 0.37 | 0.06 | — | 0.20 | 0.05 | | (0.04) | (0.02) | | (0.09) | (0.03) | | (0.05) | (0.02) |
| 5 | 60 | MSE | 4.72 | 0.98 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 3.02 | 0.62 | 0.07 | (1.08) | (0.10) | (0.02) | (0.07) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.66) | (0.06) | (0.02) | TPR | — | 0.05 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 0.53 | 1.00 | | (0.22) | (0.00) | | (0.00) | (0.00) | | (0.11) | (0.00) | FPR | — | 0.00 | 0.03 | — | 0.64 | 0.04 | — | 0.32 | 0.03 | | (0.00) | (0.03) | | (0.17) | (0.03) | | (0.09) | (0.03) | 200 | MSE | 17.30 | 1.00 | 0.12 | 2.38 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 11.56 | 0.63 | 0.09 | (2.12) | (0.00) | (0.02) | (0.48) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (1.26) | (0.00) | (0.02) | TPR | — | 0.00 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 0.50 | 1.00 | | (0.00) | (0.00) | | (0.00) | (0.00) | | (0.00) | (0.00) | FPR | — | 0.00 | 0.02 | — | 0.35 | 0.02 | — | 0.17 | 0.02 | | (0.00) | (0.01) | | (0.08) | (0.01) | | (0.04) | (0.01) |
|
|
Note. In each cell, there is mean (standard deviation).
|