Research Article
Promoting Variable Effect Consistency in Mixture Cure Model for Credit Scoring
Table 8
Results of the prediction performance in Example 3.
| | | | | Full | MCG | MCGS | Full | MCG | MCGS |
| 0.25 | 60 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 | (0.04) | (0.03) | (0.02) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | 200 | 0.83 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.03 | (0.10) | (0.08) | (0.02) | (0.07) | (0.01) | (0.01) |
| 5 | 60 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.34 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.03 | (0.19) | (0.09) | (0.21) | (0.03) | (0.01) | (0.01) | 200 | 2.62 | 0.72 | 0.21 | 0.99 | 0.04 | 0.04 | (0.21) | (0.06) | (0.10) | (0.33) | (0.01) | (0.01) |
|
|
Note. In each cell, there is mean (standard deviation).
|