Research Article
An Empirical Study on the Influence of Consolidated Financial Statement’s Amplification Effect on Audit Fees
Table 7
The impact of amplification effect and audit risk on audit fees.
| Variables | LNFEE | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
| MAGNIFICATION1 | 0.185∗∗ | 0.214∗∗∗ | 0.179∗∗ | 0.209∗∗∗ | | (2.300) | (2.841) | (2.234) | (2.778) | RISK1 | 0.654∗∗∗ | 0.608∗∗∗ | | | | (6.841) | (6.849) | | | RISK2 | | | 0.468∗∗∗ | 0.462∗∗∗ | | | | (4.784) | (5.076) | SIZE | 0.282∗∗∗ | 0.266∗∗∗ | 0.282∗∗∗ | 0.265∗∗∗ | | (41.249) | (37.191) | (40.967) | (37.026) | LEV | 0.001 | 0.129∗∗∗ | 0.007 | 0.134∗∗∗ | | (0.039) | (3.573) | (0.193) | (3.720) | TOBINQ | 0.000 | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.001 | | (0.074) | (−0.265) | (0.171) | (−0.217) | DUAL | 0.019 | 0.002 | 0.019 | 0.002 | | (1.468) | (0.173) | (1.451) | (0.148) | INDRATIO | 0.332∗∗∗ | 0.141 | 0.332∗∗∗ | 0.140 | | (3.033) | (1.352) | (3.032) | (1.346) | AGE | 0.011∗∗∗ | −0.002 | 0.010∗∗∗ | −0.002 | | (8.595) | (−1.036) | (8.483) | (−1.149) | SOE | −0.179∗∗∗ | −0.134∗∗∗ | −0.180∗∗∗ | −0.134∗∗∗ | | (−11.280) | (−8.365) | (−11.300) | (−8.359) | TOP1 | −0.001∗∗ | −0.001∗∗∗ | −0.001∗∗ | −0.001∗∗∗ | | (−2.244) | (−2.822) | (−2.387) | (−2.941) | BIG4 | 0.732∗∗∗ | 0.728∗∗∗ | 0.733∗∗∗ | 0.729∗∗∗ | | (18.019) | (18.148) | (18.054) | (18.180) | DELAY | 0.253∗∗∗ | 0.166∗∗∗ | 0.255∗∗∗ | 0.167∗∗∗ | | (15.245) | (10.477) | (15.366) | (10.552) | REC | −0.176∗∗∗ | −0.334∗∗∗ | −0.179∗∗∗ | −0.339∗∗∗ | | (−2.753) | (−5.373) | (−2.802) | (−5.449) | Constant | 6.142∗∗∗ | 6.844∗∗∗ | 6.154∗∗∗ | 6.860∗∗∗ | | (37.993) | (39.698) | (37.923) | (39.751) | YEAR | No | Yes | No | Yes | INDUSTRY | No | Yes | No | Yes | N | 24,497 | 24,497 | 24,497 | 24,497 | Adj. R2 | 0.553 | 0.597 | 0.552 | 0.597 |
|
|
Note. Cluster-adjusted t-values are in parentheses. ∗∗∗, ∗∗, and ∗ indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.
|