Research Article

Port Logistics Function Evaluation Model Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS Method

Table 4

Results of grade i evaluation of competitiveness of port city logistics function.

PortPort infrastructureScale of logistics industryHinterland economic developmentInformatization level
URankingURankingURankingURanking

Zhoushan port of Ningbo0.160750.165080.484920.13472
Port of Shanghai0.125460.401620.117880.06126
Port of Singapore0.162140.211060.268030.06995
Port of Tianjin0.122770.219740.173250.03788
Kwai Chung container terminal0.486320.230330.175640.07164
Port of Busan0.181130.189570.023590.01659
Port of Guangzhou0.971110.789410.768710.30651
Port of Suzhou0.106480.105790.128160.04777
Port of Qingdao0.037590.218750.125170.12093