Research Article
Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Rural High-Quality Development: Evidence from China
Table 7
Impact of DIF subindex on RHQD.
| | BRE FE model | DEP FE model | DIG FE model | PAY RE model | INS FE model | CRE RE model |
| | | 0.109 (3.426) | 0.107 (3.938) | 0.053 (2.740) | 0.160 (2.617) | 0.056 (3.032) | 0.169 (3.235) | | LAB | 0.180 (2.176) | 0.199 (2.658) | 0.285 (4.538) | 0.201 (1.838) | 0.271 (4.175) | 0.199 (2.090) | | GOV | 0.020 (0.513) | 0.062 (2.056) | 0.004 (0.085) | −0.030 (−0.546) | 0.039 (1.183) | 0.003 (0.067) | | OPE | −0.392 (−6.485) | −0.407 (−6.824) | −0.447 (−6.782) | −0.088 (−1.176) | −0.461 (−6.792) | −0.149 (−2.400) | | NAT | −0.037 (−2.177) | −0.043 (−2.492) | −0.049 (−2.968) | −0.034 (−2.058) | 0.054 (−2.872) | −0.030 (−2.081) | | CON | 0.246 (11.738) | 0.233 (13.333) | 0.245 (11.465) | 0.192 (4.891) | 0.246 (11.723) | 0.178 (4.985) | | (w) TEST | 0.751 (5,208) = 95.315 p = 0.001 | 0.752 (5,208) = 106.460, p = 0.001 | 0.725 (5,208) = 113.696, p = 0.001 | 0.693 χ2(5) = 484.759 p = 0.001 | 0.594 χ2(5) = 45.600 p = 0.001 | 0.718 χ2(5) = 512.670, p = 0.001 |
|
|
