|
Title | Work type | Best algorithm name | Outcome |
|
Bangladesh’s Dhaka an outbreak of dengue | Analysis of statistics and a case study | Analysis of statistics | August 2019 report from the CDC |
Dengue in Bangladesh’s capital city of Dhaka | Statistical evaluation | Statistical evaluation | KAP ratings of 69.2%, 71.4%, and 52% |
The temporal trends of dengue fever and related meteorological factors in Bangkok | Analysis of time series and ARIMA models | The models of ARIMA | Ultimately, the correlation coefficient, MAE, RMSE, and MAPE ARIMA values were 0.90, 3.83, 6.49, and 26.45, respectively |
A dengue fever forecasting model grounded in South China | Analyzing time series data and statistics | Analysis of time series | Compared to GAM (RMSE: 34.1), GAMM (RMSE: 121.9) provides a better prediction of DF cases |
Results of a hospital-based study on dengue fever in Malaysia | The models of ARIMA | The models of ARIMA | (95% CI: 1.003, 1.01), RR = 1.006 |
Dengue fever clusters in space and time in India | Time series data evaluation | Time series data evaluation | 50% of the cluster size |
Our work | Time series analysis and neural network (NN) | Neural network (NN) | The NN model gives a better prediction performance with the lowest value of RMSE 7.588889e − 06 than the time series analysis |
|