Performance Evaluation of School Enterprise Collaborative Innovation and Practice of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on the Improved AHP Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method
Table 3
Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation data table.
Primary indicators
Weight
Secondary indicators
Weight
Evaluation level
Excellent
Good
Medium
Qualified
Unqualified
Input
0.35
Policy support intensity
0.22
0.15
0.45
0.25
0.15
0
University reputation
0.22
0.25
0.60
0.05
0.10
0
Number of municipal and above scientific research platforms
0.13
0.25
0.60
0.10
0.05
0
Proportion of research funding from source enterprises
0.10
0.30
0.55
0.10
0.05
0
Number of scientific research funds
0.09
0.35
0.50
0.10
0.05
0
Alliance experience
0.09
0.40
0.55
0.025
0.025
0
Number of scientific researchers
0.09
0.35
0.60
0.025
0.025
0
Proportion of scientific research personnel with intermediate professional titles and above
0.06
0.25
0.60
0.10
0.05
0
Process
0.35
Resource matching and sharing
0.21
0.30
0.60
0.05
0.05
0
Willingness to cooperate and degree of action synergy
0.21
0.40
0.55
0.025
0.025
0
Operating mechanism
0.18
0.15
0.45
0.30
0.10
0
Communication and trust
0.14
0.35
0.60
0.025
0.025
0
Respect for intellectual property rights
0.14
0.25
0.65
0.05
0.05
0
Organizational learning and growth
0.12
0.30
0.60
0.05
0.05
0
Output
0.30
Rewards for achievements at or above the city level
0.22
0.35
0.55
0.05
0.05
0
The rate of technology transfer
0.19
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.1
0
Number of patent authorizations
0.14
0.45
0.5
0.025
0.025
0
Improvement in the quality and level of research teams
0.11
0.35
0.55
0.05
0.05
0
Number of articles (including works)
0.09
0.45
0.5
0.025
0.025
0
Promotion degree of collaborative innovation management
