Research Article

Association of Preoperative Serum Levels of CEA and CA15-3 with Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer

Table 6

Multiple logistic regression analysis of the association of clinicopathological characteristics with serum CEA, CA15-3, and CA125 levels.

CharacteristicORCI value

Model 1 CEA
 Age (years)
  ≥50 vs. <504.3192.040-9.1430.0001
 Tumor size (cm)
  ≥2 vs. <22.3641.185-4.7150.0146
 Node status
  N1 vs. N01.7700.918-3.4130.0885
 Molecular type
  Luminal A vs. Her2+0.6790.273-1.6890.4056
  Luminal B1 vs. Her2+0.3860.163-0.9180.0313
  Luminal B2 vs. Her2+0.9330.365-2.3820.8840
  Triple-negative vs. Her2+0.2940.078-1.1100.0710
Model 2 CEA
 Age (years)
  ≥50 vs. <504.2992.036-9.0790.0001
 Tumor size (cm)
  ≥2 vs. <22.2621.141-4.4820.0193
 Node status
  N1 vs. N01.7490.910-3.3590.0934
 Her2
  Positive vs. negative2.1561.169-3.9790.0139
Model 3 CA15-3
 Histologic grade
  Grade 2 vs. Grade 11.7170.213-13.8620.6120
  Grade 3 vs. Grade 12.2090.228-18.0620.5260
 Tumor size (cm)
  ≥2 vs. <23.0191.538-5.9260.0013
 Node status
  N1 vs. N02.6331.387-5.0010.0031
 Molecular type
  Luminal A vs. luminal B20.4570.173-1.2030.1127
  Luminal B1 vs. luminal B20.3490.154-0.7910.0117
  Her2+ vs. luminal B20.4780.170-1.3460.1620
  Triple-negative vs. luminal B21.2930.536-3.1190.5676
Model 4 CA15-3
 Histologic grade
  Grade 2 vs. Grade 11.7650.229-13.5860.5851
  Grade 3 vs. Grade 12.2440.271-18.5930.4536
 Tumor size (cm)
  ≥2 vs. <22.8651.464-5.6080.0021
 Node status
  N1 vs. N02.7201.440-5.1400.0020
 ER
  Positive vs. negative0.6070.242-1.5230.2874
 PR
  Positive vs. negative0.7940.327-1.9240.6088
Model 5 CA125
 Tumor size (cm)
  ≥2 vs. <21.5500.863-2.7820.1423
 Node status
  N1 vs. N01.9031.070-3.3860.0286
 PR
  Positive vs. negative0.5670.323-0.9960.0486

, , and .