Research Article

A Method to Reduce Route Discovery Cost of UAV Ad Hoc Network

Table 1

Summary of related work.

WorkRouting protocolEvaluation metricsKey advantagesLimitations

Namdev et al. [11]AODV, OLSRPacket delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, throughput, jitterAODV performs better than OLSR for low-density and highly dynamic networksDoes not consider the impact of network size on performance
Zemrane et al. [12]Reactive, proactivePacket loss, delay, jitter, throughput, network loadProactive protocols are more efficient for high-load networks, while reactive protocols are better suited for low-load networksDo not consider the impact of mobility on performance
Wang et al. [13]OAODVLatency, routing overhead, link generationOAODV performs better than AODV and OLSR in terms of routing overhead and time latencyDoes not consider the impact of network size and mobility on performance
Wang et al. [24]AODVPath discovery timeAODV is less efficient in terms of path discovery time compared to other protocolsDoes not consider other performance metrics
Khan et al. [14]AODVStability, packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delayAODV results in decreased stability of FANETs due to the high cost during path discoveryDoes not consider other performance metrics
Yu et al. [25]BIMPCEnd-to-end delay, delivery ratio, overheadSuitable for the cluster formation of large-scale UAV networks with dynamic natureDoes not take into account highly dynamic UAV networks.
Yu et al. [26]APARDistance, stability, and congestion levelDesigned to mitigate congestion and link breakage in UAV networks. Its approach effectively ensures the selection of optimal routes and enhances network performanceMay face limitations in addressing the mobility of UAVs.
Uddin et al. [27]UAPCluster-based protocol, packet delivery ratio, energy consumptionURP is suitable for deployment in UAV networks that lack existing infrastructure and can be quickly set upURP is specifically designed for wireless sensor networks (WSNs) assisted with a UAV using a single-hop transmission scheme. Therefore, it may not be suitable for applications that require a multihop transmission scheme
Aadil et al. [28]EACRPacket delivery ratio, overhead, end-to-end delayEACR minimizes energy consumption by dynamically adjusting the transmission range of UAVs and optimizing the routing calculation based on the remaining energy of the nodesThe EACR protocol is designed to minimize energy consumption by controlling the transmission range and optimizing routing calculations. However, similar to the BIMPC protocol, EACR only considers UAV nodes with moderate mobility