|
Work | Routing protocol | Evaluation metrics | Key advantages | Limitations |
|
Namdev et al. [11] | AODV, OLSR | Packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, throughput, jitter | AODV performs better than OLSR for low-density and highly dynamic networks | Does not consider the impact of network size on performance |
Zemrane et al. [12] | Reactive, proactive | Packet loss, delay, jitter, throughput, network load | Proactive protocols are more efficient for high-load networks, while reactive protocols are better suited for low-load networks | Do not consider the impact of mobility on performance |
Wang et al. [13] | OAODV | Latency, routing overhead, link generation | OAODV performs better than AODV and OLSR in terms of routing overhead and time latency | Does not consider the impact of network size and mobility on performance |
Wang et al. [24] | AODV | Path discovery time | AODV is less efficient in terms of path discovery time compared to other protocols | Does not consider other performance metrics |
Khan et al. [14] | AODV | Stability, packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay | AODV results in decreased stability of FANETs due to the high cost during path discovery | Does not consider other performance metrics |
Yu et al. [25] | BIMPC | End-to-end delay, delivery ratio, overhead | Suitable for the cluster formation of large-scale UAV networks with dynamic nature | Does not take into account highly dynamic UAV networks. |
Yu et al. [26] | APAR | Distance, stability, and congestion level | Designed to mitigate congestion and link breakage in UAV networks. Its approach effectively ensures the selection of optimal routes and enhances network performance | May face limitations in addressing the mobility of UAVs. |
Uddin et al. [27] | UAP | Cluster-based protocol, packet delivery ratio, energy consumption | URP is suitable for deployment in UAV networks that lack existing infrastructure and can be quickly set up | URP is specifically designed for wireless sensor networks (WSNs) assisted with a UAV using a single-hop transmission scheme. Therefore, it may not be suitable for applications that require a multihop transmission scheme |
Aadil et al. [28] | EACR | Packet delivery ratio, overhead, end-to-end delay | EACR minimizes energy consumption by dynamically adjusting the transmission range of UAVs and optimizing the routing calculation based on the remaining energy of the nodes | The EACR protocol is designed to minimize energy consumption by controlling the transmission range and optimizing routing calculations. However, similar to the BIMPC protocol, EACR only considers UAV nodes with moderate mobility |
|