Review Article

Quality of Life Assessments Utilized in Vitiligo Clinical Trials

Table 2

Breakdown of included vitiligo clinical trials assessing QoL measures.

Parameter of interestOutcome in QoL studiesOutcome in non-QoL studies value using Fischer’s exact test

Number of clinical trials24 total studies36 total studies = 0.002
 Phase 2: n (%)17 (47.22%)19 (55.88%)
 Phase 3: n (%)7 (58.33%)5 (13.89%)
 Unspecified: n (%)0 (0.00%)12 (33.33%)
Specific indication = 0.288
 Vitiligo, n (%)18 (75.00%)31 (86.11%)
Nonsegmental vitiligo, n (%)6 (25.00%)4 (11.11%)
 Unspecified/other, n (%)0 (0.00%)1 (2.78%)
Gender = 0.400
 All23 (95.83%)36 (100.00%)
 Male only1 (4.17%)0 (0.00%)
 Female only0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)
Enrollment, n = 0.063
 0–207 (29.17%)8 (22.22%)
 20–508 (33.33%)16 (44.44%)
 50–1001 (4.17%)8 (22.22%)
 100+8 (33.33%)4 (11.11%)
Date of clinical trialp = 0.199
 2000–20051 (4.17%)0 (0.00%)
 2006–20100 (0.00%)7 (19.44%)
 2011–20156 (25.00%)11 (30.56%)
 2016–20208 (33.33%)7 (19.44%)
 2021–present9 (37.50%)11 (30.56%)
Type of interventionp = 0.022
 Medication (pharmaceutical)18 (75.00%)19 (52.78%)
 Laser/photo/other (nonpharmaceutical)1 (4.17%)12 (33.33%)
 Medication + laser/photo/other (both)5 (20.83%)5 (13.89%)
Locationp = 0.029
 Within US16 (66.67%)13 (36.11%)
 Outside US7 (29.17%)22 (61.11%)
 Unknown1 (4.17%)1 (2.78%)
QoL as outcome measureN/AN/A
 Primary measure, n (%)1 (4.17%)
 Secondary measure, n (%)22 (91.67%)
 Other, n (%)1 (4.17%)
Number of QoL measures assessedN/AN/A
 One19 (79.17%)
 Two5 (20.83%)
QOL measurement used29 totalN/AN/A
 DLQI, n (%)16 (55.17%)
 CDLQI, n (%)4 (13.79%)
 VitiQoL, n (%)4 (13.79%)
 VIS, n (%)1 (3.45%)
 Patient satisfaction, n (%)2 (6.90%)
 Patient global assessment, n (%)1 (3.45%)
 Unspecified, n (%)1 (3.45%)

Includes trials listed as phase 1 and 2 and phase 2 and 3. QoL = quality of life; DLQI = Dermatology Life Quality Index; CDLQI = Child Dermatology Life Quality Index; VitiQoL = Vitiligo Quality of Life Index; VIS = vitiligo impact scale.