Review Article
Systematic Review of Integrative Health Care Research: Randomized Control Trials, Clinical Controlled Trials, and Meta-Analysis
Table 4
Descriptive of clinical trials of choice of care (multidimensional) integrative healthcare interventions ().
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abbreviations: ABCW: Women with breast cancer, anthroposophic therapy; CBCW: Women with breast cancer, conventional therapy; CHC: Coronary heart disease; DUREL: Duke University religion index; EORTC QLQ-C30: European organization for research and treatment of cancer, quality of life questionnaire core 30; FRS: Framingham risk score; LSQ: Life satisfaction questionnaire; MAC: Mental adjustment to cancer scale; MANTRA: Monitoring & actualization of noetic training; MIT: Music, imagery, and touch; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; PHP: Personalized health planning; SMT: Spinal manipulative therapy; SSTA: Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory; U: Unknown; UC: Usual care; and VAS: Visual analog scale. #Evidence direction on primary measures. Weak: no outcome measures positive despite sufficient statistical power to do so, Mixed: at least one primary outcome measure positive at the level of , Strong 50% of measures positive at the level of , and Inconclusive: study failed to demonstrate a change but lacked the statistical power to demonstrate. *SIGN checklist for RCTs and controlled clinical trials ++: Strong. All or most of the criteria have been fulfilled. +: Article is neither exceptionally strong nor exceptionally weak. ā: Weak. Few or no criteria fulfilled. |