Research Article
Effects of Genital Nerve Stimulation Amplitude on Bladder Capacity in Spinal Cord Injured Subjects
Table 4
The response of bladder capacity in chronological order with a randomized stimulation intensity.
| | Subject | The sequence of cystometric fill trials in each subject | | ID | 1st trial | 2nd trial | 3rd trial | 4th trial | 5th trial |
| | 1 | 0% (Control) | 73.0% (1T) ā | 113.2% (3T) | 76.1% (2T) | 5.6% (control) | | 2 | 0% (Control) | 25.8% (2T) | 25.3% (1T) | 35.6% (3T) | 2.6% (control) | | 3 | 0% (Control) | 43.3% (4T) | 22.8% (2T) | 31.9% (1T) | 31.9% (3T) | | 4 | 0% (Control) | 70.0% (1T) | 112.9% (3T) | 60% (2T) | 129.3% (4T) | | 6 | 0% (Control) | 29.6% (2T) | 28.4% (1T) | 89.4% (4T) | 47.3% (3T) | | 8 | 0% (Control) | 140.6% (1T) | 42.7% (2T) | 110.4% (3T) | 93.8% (4T) | | 9 | 0% (Control) | 18.0% (2T) | -7.6% (control) | 18.3% (3T) | 17.4% (1T) | | 10 | 0% (Control) | 5.5% (1T) | 38.6% (3T) | 7.4% (2T) | 49.3% (4T) |
|
|
ā 73.0% (1T) represents a 73.0% bladder capacity gain at 1T stimulation intensity compared to its corresponding control value.
|
