The Activity Screening of Hmong Herbs Caesalpiniaminax and an Antitumor Effect Study

Table 5

Analysis of tumor weight (n = 10, Mean ± SD).

Group	Administration routes	Dose (mg·kg^−1)	Tumor weight (g)	IR2 (%)
Control group	ip + ig	—	1.582 ± 0.6581	—
FU group	Ip	83	0.340 ± 0.2212	78.51
ip. group	Ip	60	0.562 ± 0.3120	64.47
		20	1.058 ± 0.6898	33.12
ig. group	Ig	300	0.737 ± 0.5543	53.41
		100	1.078 ± 0.9428	31.86

Note: compared with the control group, , , and .