Research Article
Study on the Selection of the Targets of Esophageal Carcinoma and Interventions of Ginsenosides Based on Network Pharmacology and Bioinformatics
Table 3
Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis of the correlation of EpCAM expression with OS among ESCA patients.
| Parameter | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | HR | 95% CI | | HR | 95% CI | |
| Age | 1.00 | 0.98–1.03 | 0.731 | 1.02 | 0.98–1.05 | 0.323 | Gender | 4.23 | 1.02–17.47 | 0.046 | 2.15 | 0.49–9.46 | 0.310 | Histologic grade | 1.48 | 0.92–2.36 | 0.102 | 0.94 | 0.53–1.66 | 0.821 | Stage | 2.51 | 1.68–3.75 | 7.40E 06 | 1.73 | 0.57–5.27 | 0.336 | T classification | 1.32 | 0.90–1.94 | 0.159 | 1.14 | 0.66–1.96 | 0.633 | M classification | 3.64 | 1.60–8.28 | 0.002 | 1.87 | 0.27–13.09 | 0.529 | N classification | 1.74 | 1.27–2.39 | 0.001 | 1.34 | 0.72–2.46 | 0.363 | EpCAM | 1.00 | 1.00–1.01 | 0.004 | 1.00 | 1.00–1.01 | 0.010 |
|
|
Bold values indicate . HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. |