Review Article
The Effect of Art Therapy in Women with Gynecologic Cancer: A Systematic Review
Table 3
Risk of bias and quality assessment of quasiexperiment study.
| Item | Yes/no/unclear/not applicable | Wiswell et al. (2019) | Lee et al. (2017) |
| 1. Is it clear in the study what is the “cause” and what is the “effect” (i.e., there is no confusion about which variable comes first)? | Yes | Yes | 2. Were the participants included in any comparisons similar? | Not applicable | Not applicable | 3. Were the participants included in any comparisons receiving similar treatment/care, other than the exposure or intervention of interest? | Not applicable | Not applicable | 4. Was there a control group? | No | No | 5. Were there multiple measurements of the outcome, both before and after the intervention/exposure? | Yes | Yes | 6. Was follow-up complete and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow-up adequately described and analyzed? | Yes | Yes | 7. Were the outcomes of participants included in any comparisons measured in the same way? | Not applicable | Not applicable | 8. Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? | Yes | Yes | 9. Was an appropriate statistical analysis used? | Yes | Yes |
|
|