Review Article
Comparison of Different Physical Therapies Combined with Acupuncture for Poststroke Cognitive Impairment: a Network Meta-Analysis
Table 1
Basic characteristics of the included trials.
| Author | Year | Number of patients | Age (year) | Male/female | Treatment | Intervention period (wk) | Outcome indicator | I | C | C2 | I | C | C2 | I | C | C2 |
| Jiang [13] | 2016 | 52 | 49 | 52 | 57.88 ± 9.45 | 56.18 ± 11.86 | 57.75 ± 13.74 | 72/81 | Acupuncture + RehaCom | Conventional treatment | Acupuncture | 12 | ①, ② | Deng [14] | 2015 | 21 | 21 | — | 62.24 ± 10.25 | 25/17 | Acupuncture + TMS | Conventional treatment | — | 4 | ①, ②, ③ | Gao [15] | 2019 | 30 | 30 | — | 64.33 ± 9.07 | 58.43 ± 14.02 | — | 36/24 | Acupuncture + TMS | Acupuncture | — | 3.7 | ①, ④ | Liang [16] | 2010 | 59 | 55 | — | 61.2 ± 10.1 | 59.2 ± 11.2 | — | 68/46 | Acupuncture + HBO | Conventional treatment | — | 3.6 | ③, ④ | Liu [17] | 2019 | 42 | 41 | — | 67.6 ± 6.48 | 68.3 ± 6.75 | — | 45/38 | Acupuncture + UWE | Acupuncture | — | 4 | ①、③ | Ma [18] | 2018 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 60.97 ± 7.15 | 62.32 ± 8.84 | 60.12 ± 6.56 | 53/37 | Acupuncture + HBO | Acupuncture | HBO | 4.3 | ① | Wang [19] | 2016 | 43 | 43 | — | 44.55 ± 30.23 | 44.45 ± 30.91 | — | 59/27 | Acupuncture + HBO | HBO | — | 2.9 | ④ | Xie [20] | 2018 | 45 | 45 | — | 63.76 ± 6.84 | 64.23 ± 6.57 | — | 50/40 | Acupuncture + UWE | Acupuncture | — | 4 | ①, ③, ④ | Yang [21] | 2020 | 29 | 29 | 28 | 58.41 ± 8.99 | 56.55 ± 8.53 | 60.11 ± 10.05 | 62/24 | Acupuncture + HBO | Acupuncture | HBO | 4 | ②, ③ | Yu [22] | 2018 | 30 | 30 | — | 63.84 ± 1.55 | 34/26 | Acupuncture + TMS | Conventional treatment | — | 2.9 | ②, ③ | Zhang [23] | 2012 | 60 | 55 | — | 59.2 ± 8.6 | 60.2 ± 9.2 | — | 69/46 | Acupuncture + HBO | Conventional treatment | — | 2.9 | ②, ③ | Zhang [24] | 2013 | 34 | 34 | — | 64.70 ± 8.2 | 63.10 ± 7.6 | — | 44/24 | Acupuncture + HBO | Conventional treatment | — | 2.1 | ① | Zhang [25] | 2016 | 43 | 43 | — | 67.3 ± 5.8 | 68.2 ± 5.5 | — | 52/34 | Acupuncture + HBO | HBO | — | 3 | ①, ④ | Jiang [26] | 2015 | 28 | 28 | 27 | 55.13 ± 7.0 | 58.20 ± 6.82 | 56.73 ± 7.648 | 42/39 | Acupuncture + RehaCom | Conventional treatment | Acupuncture | 12 | ② | Bie [27] | 2011 | 36 | 36 | — | 61.4 ± 9.8 | 62.1 ± 10.2 | — | 38/34 | Acupuncture + TMS | Acupuncture | — | 4 | ①, ④ |
|
|
① MMSE; ② MoCA; ③ BI; ④ the total effective rate of clinical treatment; I: Intervention; C: Control
|