Review Article

The Current Strategies in Controlling Oral Diseases by Herbal and Chemical Materials

Table 2

Recent strategies in dental caries prevention.

TreatmentType of studyMethodsOutcomesRef/year

Stannous fluoride productsIn vivoThe groups were as follows: the test group using stannous fluoride products and the control group.The analysis showed no effect of stannous fluoride products.[37]/2018

Sodium fluoride dental protective agent combined with pit and fissure sealantIn vivoThe groups were as follows: in the control group pit and fissure sealant was used, and in the test group sodium fluoride tooth protector joined with pit and fissure sealant was used.The combined group had better results.[38]/2019

GI and RBSIn vivoThe groups were as follows: GI and RBS.Groups were the same in the survival of GI and RBS.[39]/2017

Ozone, sealant, and fluoride varnishIn vivoThe groups were as follows: (1) control; (2) fluoride varnish; (3) sealant; (4) ozone.The use of fissure sealant, fluoride varnish, and ozone is suggested for prevention of occlusal pit and fissure caries.[40]/2016

Silver diamine fluoride (SDF)In vivoSDF (38%) or Pl was applied topically. The primary outcome was caries arrest (Nyvad criteria).Topical 38% SDF was effective in arresting cavities.[41]/2018

RBS and GIIn vivoThe groups were as follows: RBS, GI sealant, and control.The RBS was higher than the GI sealant in prevention of caries.[42]/2018

F coating joined with PRF or PTSIn vivoThe groups were as follows: group A, PTS; B, PRF; C, 0.5% F coating + pit and fissure sealing; D, 0.5% fluoride + preventive resin filling; E, control.Groups C and A had a certain effect on prevention of dental caries, but group D was better.[43]/2018

Lactobacillus paracaseiIn vivoThe groups were as follows: probiotic milk or control (standard milk).Probiotic milk reduced salivary S. mutans count.[44]/2018

MIV and MIPPIn vivoThe groups were as follows: FTP, using MIV + MIPP application, and control.Groups were the same in ICDAS scores and EDI sum.[45]/2018

CXT and FJIn vivoThe groups were as follows: CXT or FJ.GIC sealants were effective in preventing caries.[46]/2018

PTS and FVIn vivoThe groups were as follows: resin-based fissure sealant or FV was applied.Groups were the same in caries prevention.[47]/2017

Xylitol-containing chewing gumIn vivoThe groups were as follows: in the test group xylitol gum + oral health education were used, and in control group oral health education alone was used.Both groups had a reduction in the caries rate.[48]/2017

MInIn vivoThe groups were as follows: CE or MIn.MIn group was better in prevention of caries.[49]/2019

PTS combined with fluorine protective paintIn vivoThe groups were as follows: control, PTS, and PTS + fluorine protective paint.Pit and fissure sealant + fluoride protective paint can decrease the incidence of dental caries.[50]/2019

MInIn vivoThe groups were as follows: HE, MIn, and MI + RA.MIn group had higher preventive effects against caries than HE group.[51]/2017

TiF4 varnishIn vivo/in situThe groups were as follows: TiF4 varnish, Duraphat, Pl varnish, and no treatment.F-varnishes showed caries-preventive effect.[52]/2019
 Silver NP + PTSIn vivo/in situThe groups were as follows: conventional and silver NP combined with PTS.Silver NP mixed sealant was more effective than conventional sealant in reducing tooth demineralization.[53]/2017

Fluoride varnishIn vivoThe groups were as follows: fluoride varnish or Pl.Quarterly applications of fluoride varnish were not effective in preventing development of dental caries.[54]/2016

Different fluoride regimensIn vivoThe groups were as follows: G1: control group, fluoride (F) TP (1450 ppm); G2: FTP (1450 ppm) + 0.2% F oral rinse; G3: TP (5000 ppm).The recommendation was application of FTP (5000 ppm F) or oral rinse (0.2% NaF) + usual TPs.[55]/2019

Moisture tolerant RBS and GISIn vivoThe groups were as follows: moisture tolerant RBS or GIS was placed on one side of the mouth, and the other one was placed on the opposing side. DIAGNOdent readings were taken.Both materials were effective in arresting enamel caries.[56]/2019

Fluoride varnish DuraphatIn vivoThe groups were as follows: fluoride varnish and control.Fluoride varnish Duraphat was effective in decreasing caries incidence.[57]/2019

Low-dose xylitol chewing gumIn vivoThe groups were as follows: xylitol and polyols.Xylitol group showed a significantly lower increment of dental caries.[58]/2017

RBS with and without FIn vivoThe groups were as follows: sealants with or without fluoride and control.The effects of the sealants were similar.[59]/2018

Xylitol and polyol chewing gumIn vivoThe groups were as follows: xylitol chewing gum, polyol chewing gum, and control group.Xylitol-containing chewing gum was effective in decreasing caries incidence.[60]/2018

Oral health education (OHE) and FVIn vivoThe groups were as follows: control, OHE, and OHE + FV.OHE or OHE + FV reduced the caries incidence.[61]/2016

FM and DIn vivoThe groups were as follows: participants brushed their teeth with either a D (1150 ppm) or a Pl D without F and either daily application of FM (220 ppm) or not.FM was effective in remineralization.[62]/2018

Biannual treatment with FVIn vivoThe groups were as follows: standard yearly intervention with or without FV.Biannual treatment with FV was not effective in preventing dental caries.[63]/2017

STB and SIn vivoThe groups were as follows: STB, CR sealant, and ART-GIC sealant.The groups were the same in preventing caries.[64]/2015

SDF 12% and SDF 38%In vivoThe groups were as follows: 12% SDF applied yearly, 12% SDF applied twice a year, 38% SDF applied yearly, and 38% SDF applied twice a year.Higher concentration or frequency of SDF had more effect in arresting active tooth caries.[65]/2018

FV and peptide P11-4In vivoThe groups were as follows: P11-4 + FV or FV.P11-4+FV was effective in early carious lesions.[66]/2018

CHX/thymol V or FVIn vivoThe groups were as follows: three-time monthly use of CHX/thymol varnish or semiannual use of FV + semiannual use of Pl V.The groups were the same in dental caries development.[67]/2015

FM, EO, and CHX oral rinsesIn vivoThe groups were as follows: FM; EO; CHX; control (saline).FM and CHX had more effect than EO mouth rinse.[68]/2015

 F, CPP-ACP, IRIn vivoThe groups were as follows: A, control (blank); B, control (Irr); C, Irr + F; D, Irr + CPP-ACP, E, Irr + CPP-ACP + F; F, Irr + IR; G, Irr + IR + F; H, Irr + IR + CPP-ACP.IR + CPP-ACP, IR + F, CPP-ACP + F, and IR were the best effective methods to prevent Irr-dentin-destructions.[69]/2019

TP containing ArgIn vivo/in vitroIndividuals wearing a dental device: the studies stages were lead-in, Arg-free, washout, and Arg-active stages.Arg-containing TP can significantly decrease the LA construction.[70]/2017

Varnish containing chlorhexidineIn vivoThe groups were as follows: Cervitec Plus® or Pl varnishes.Application of Cervitec Plus® had a significant advancement in patients’ oral health.[71]/2018

Herbal extracts (Tulsi and Black myrobalan) and sodium fluorideIn vivoThe groups were as follows: (1) FM, (2) Tulsi mouth rinse, and (3) Black myrobalan mouth rinse.Herbal mouth rinses could be tried as an anticaries agent for dental caries.[72]/2018

FVIn vivoFV applied every three months.The use of fluoride varnish every three months prevented the incidence of caries.[73]/2019

Infiltrant applicationIn vivoThe groups were as follows: icon infiltrant (DMG) and PFS (Alpha Seal-DFL).The infiltrant was effective in preventing the caries progression comparable with the conventional sealant.[74]/2017

Fluoridated milkIn vivoThe groups were as follows: fluoridated milk and nonintervention.Consumption of fluoridated milk could significantly (34%) reduce the caries.[75]/2018

PRG filler-containing sealant placed with a self-etching primer/adhesiveIn vivoThe groups were as follows: self-etch primed sealant (BeautiSealant, Shofu) or the etch and rinse sealant (Seal it, Spident).The groups were the same in caries prevention.[76]/2018

High-fluoride toothpasteIn vivoThe groups were as follows: 5,000 ppm F toothpaste or 1,450 ppm F toothpaste.High-fluoride toothpaste had more effects than control toothpaste in preventing caries.[77]/2019

FVIn vivoThe groups were as follows: FV or Pl.FV application was not effective in children.[78]/2018

MInIn vivoThe groups were as follows: HE and MIn.MIn had more effect than HE in reducing caries.[79]/2018

Hydrophilic F-releasing sealant and ACP sealantIn vivoThe groups were as follows: Aegis™ or Embrace WetBond™ sealant.Aegis™ was more effective than Embrace WetBond™ sealant as Aegis™ demonstrated lower caries scores.[80]/2019

School-based fluoride varnish programIn vivoVolunteers used FTP at home.The school-based fluoride varnish program prevented progression of caries.[81]/2016

Topical FIn vivoThe groups were as follows: (1) annual use of SDF solution (30%); (2) three-time use of SDF (30%) per week; (3) three-time use of 5% FV per week.Yearly use of SDF solution had more effect than three-time use of FV or SDF solution.[82]/2018

Nutrition and hygiene educationIn vivoThe groups were as follows: intervention and control.The education intervention reduced the progression of caries.[83]/2018

Organoselenium-containing pit/fissure sealant (DenteShield™ (DS)) and  UltraSeal™ XT Plus (UXT) In vivoThe groups were as follows: DS and UXT.The groups had the same results for Caries prevention.[84]/2019

Fluoride TPIn vivo/in vitroVolunteers used FD or not.FD group had lower demineralization.[85]/2016

Toothpastes with fluoride and hydroxyapatiteIn vivoThe groups were as follows: toothpastes with hydroxyapatite and fluoride.Observation group had significantly higher ( > 0.05) acid resistance compared with the group of patients using fluoride toothpaste.[86]/2018

Ordinary and PB cake (Bacillus coagulans)In vivoThe groups were as follows: (1) 1-week consumption of PB cake, then 4-week washout period, and 1-week consumption of regular cake; (2) consumption of the cakes was reversed.The addition of PB bacteria led to a slight increase in the number of SM bacteria in the saliva.[87]/2019

Ordinary TB and an interactive power TBIn vivoThe groups were as follows: power TB with Bluetooth technology or an ordinary handy TB.An interactive power TB was more effective in plaque removal versus a handy TB.[88]/2019

Food enriched with probioticsIn vivoThe groups were as follows: PB milk and standard milk.The groups were the same in the incidence of caries.[89]/2018

Resin infiltration In vivoThe groups were as follows: 1) FTP + flossing + infiltration; 2) control group (FTP + flossing).Infiltration group had better results than control group.[90]/2018

GI sand resin sIn vivoThe groups were as follows: GIS and RS.GISs presented effective prevention of caries development.[91]/2016

PB yogurt and gums with xylitolIn vivoThe groups were as follows: PB yogurt or gums with xylitol.The groups were the same in reduction of SM counts.[92]/2017

Fissurit FX sealant and Grandio Seal nanofilled fissure sealantIn vivoThe groups were as follows: Fissurit FX sealant and Grandio Seal nanofilled fissure sealant.Fissurit FX and Grandio Seal pit and fissure sealants were similar in caries prevention.[93]/2019

Photodynamic therapy and USIn vivoThe groups were as follows: PDT with MB and US.PDT or US postponed side effects.[94]/2018

Fluoride varnish or fluoride mouth rinseIn vivoThe groups were as follows: semiannual fluoride varnish applications (FV) and fluoride mouth rinses once per week (FMR).The groups had the same results in dental caries progress.[95]/2016

PB and normal milkIn vivoThe groups were as follows: PB milk and standard milk.Long-term drinking of probiotic milk may decrease caries progress.[96]/2016

Intensive FVIn vivoThe groups were as follows: 3 applications of FV in 2 weeks and extra applications at 1 and 3 months; FV treatment twice a year.The intensive FV application had no adequate effect to prevent dental caries.[97]/2018
 ErythritolIn vivoThe groups were as follows: erythritol, xylitol, or sorbitol (control) group.Erythritol consumption had caries-preventive effect.[98]/2016

Interdental cleaning deviceIn vivoThe groups were as follows: manual toothbrush + mechanical interdental device or manual toothbrush alone.The combination group had a superior plaque removal compared to manual brushing alone.[99]/2018

FTP containing zinc ionsIn situThe groups were as follows: F, F/ZN/phytate, F/Zn, and F Pl.Phytate had slight effect on capability of fluoride to prevent more advanced lesion demineralization. Moreover, zinc ions had no bad effect on fluoride ability.[99]/2018

High-fluoride varnishIn vivoThe groups were as follows: differing frequencies of Duraphat varnish application.Periodic application of fluoride varnish could be useful in prevention of white spots.[100]/2016

Fluoride varnishIn vivoThe groups were as follows: control and use of FV (every 3 or 6 months).Results suggested using FV with three-month intervals for prevention of caries.[101]/2019

Fluoride varnishIn vivoThe groups were as follows: (1) dental hygiene + FTP and one-time use of three varnishes: Fluor Protector S, Elmex® fluid, or control (Pl).FV application had no extra protective benefit.[102]/2016

Toothpaste with nanosized sodium hexametaphosphateIn vivo/in vitroThe groups were as follows: conventional fluoride TP, fluoride TP (1100 ppm), fluoride TP (1100F + micro HMP), and fluoride TP (1100F + nano HMP).1100F/HMPnano revealed a superior protective effect against enamel demineralization.[15]/2019

Three different compositions of topical fluoride varnishesIn vivoThe groups were as follows: FV having CPP-ACP; FV having xylitol; FV with 0.9% difluorosilane.FV having CPP-ACP showed higher decrease in SM count.[103]/2019

CHX MR, combination MR, and green tea extract MRIn vivoVolunteers used different MR.Green tea mouth rinse was effective in prevention of caries.[104]/2017

Povidone-iodine (PI), CHX, or FV (fluor protector) In vivoThe groups were as follows: PI, CHX V, or FV and control.Fluoride varnish showed higher decrease in S. mutans count.[105]/2017

Probiotic milk and fluoride mouth rinseIn vivoThe groups were as follows: probiotic milk and fluoride mouthwash.Groups were the same in reduction of S. mutans and PI scores.[106]/2019

Topical fluoridesIn vivoThe groups were as follows: group 1, 30% SDF solution yearly; group 2, 30% SDF solution per week; group 3, 5% FV per week.Application of SDF had more effect on arresting caries than FV.[107]/2016

Milk sweetened with xylitolIn vivoThe groups were as follows: (a) xylitol milk, 8 g/200 ml, one time daily; (b) xylitol milk, 4 g/100 ml, two times daily; (c) sorbitol milk, 8 g/200 ml, one time daily; (d) sorbitol milk, 4 g/100 ml, two times daily; or (e) sucrose milk 8 g/200 ml, one time daily.There were no significant differences in caries incidence between groups.[108]/2016

Probiotic chewing tabletsIn vivoThe groups were as follows: the test group got chewing probiotic tablet and the Pl group got the same tablets without bacteria.Probiotic chewing tablets could be helpful in reducing caries.[109]/2015

Fluoride TPIn vivoThe selected product was brushed twice daily for 4 months.Clinpro 5000, Clinpro Crème, and MI paste Plus all could be helpful in reducing white spot lesions.[110]/2019

Probiotic lozengeIn vivoThe groups were as follows: probiotic lozenge and Pl lozenge.Probiotic group had significantly lower S. mutans.[111]/2019

Self-etching adhesives having an AB agent and/or FIn vitro/in vivoThe groups were as follows: fluoride-containing (One-Up Bond F Plus, OP), MDPB and fluoride-containing adhesive (Clearfil Protect Bond, PB).The AB group had lower demineralization adjacent to restorations.[112]/2015

CPP-ACP and xylitol gumIn vivoThe groups were as follows: gum containing CPP-ACP and xylitol.Both gums increase saliva’s properties.[113]/2017

Resin infiltrationIn vivoThe groups were as follows: test group lesions were treated with resin infiltration + 5% topical NaF application and control group with 5% NaF alone.Resin infiltration was more effective in reducing the development of initial proximal enamel lesions compared with the other group.[114]/2018

Salt fluoridationIn vivoThe groups were as follows: salt containing fluoride and control.Salt containing fluoride was more effective in prevention of caries.[115]/2018

Sodium fluoride varnishIn vivoThe groups were as follows: intervention group (fluoride varnish) and control group.Significant caries reversal was seen in primary dentition after intensive fluoride application after 1 year of study.[116]/2017

Sour cherry extractIn vivoThe groups were as follows: gum with cherry extract or control.Sour cherry extract may have effect on prevention of caries.[117]/2018

Arginine-containing TPIn vivo/in vitroThe groups were as follows: fluoridated TPs (FD) and arginine-containing fluoridated TPs (AFD).AFD had an anticaries effect like that of ordered fluoridated TPs.[118]/2018

PBM of major salivary glandsIn vivoThe groups were as follows: continuous mode LED light, pulsed mode LED light, and control group.Results suggested that PBM of salivary glands reduces risk of caries.[119]/2020

Herbal mouthwashIn vivoThe groups were as follows: herbal mouthwash, chlorhexidine mouthwash, or Pl mouthwash.The effectiveness of herbal mouthwash in decreasing plaque formation was similar to chlorhexidine.[120]/2018

Filling intervention health educationIn vivoThe groups were as follows: intervention group receiving filling of teeth; and health education group.Intervention group had better results.[121]/2015

CHX and F MRIn vivoThe groups were as follows: (a) CHX (0.12%) + NaF (0.2%); (b) NaF (0.2%); (c) CHX (0.12%); (d) control.Groups a and c had similar plaque formation.[89]/2018

Resin infiltrationIn vivoThe groups were as follows: resin infiltration or control.Progression of caries was significantly higher in control versus infiltration group.[122]/2018

Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteriIn vivoThe groups were as follows: probiotic lozenges and Pl lozenges.Probiotic lozenges reduced bacterial counts significantly.[123]/2018

GIC sealantIn vivoThe groups were as follows: sealant application with or without extra light curing.Caries prevention in both groups was similar.[124]/2019

Propolis dental varnishIn vivoPropolis varnishes were used in different concentrations (1%, 2.5%, 5%, and 10%).Propolis V has AM activity.[125]/2020

Resin infiltrationIn vivoThe groups were as follows: infiltration and control.Resin infiltration was more effective in reducing caries progression.[126]/2016

GIS covered with resin-based agentsIn vivoFuji VII was used and covered with G-Coat Plus or Heliobond.The results were the same in both groups in incidence of caries.[127]/2017

CPP-ACPIn vivoThe groups were as follows: stannous F gel (0.4%) with or without CPP-ACP.CPP-ACP was not effective in decreasing caries development.[128]/2015

New sealantIn vivoThe groups were as follows: Select Defense™ sealant; control.Test group had lower incidence of WSLs.[129]/2016

Atraumatic restorative treatment by chlorhexidine: disinfection or incorporationIn vivoThe groups were as follows: group (a) CHX having GIC; group (b) CHX; group (c) regular GIC.Both chlorhexidine disinfection and incorporation showed higher efficacy in inhibiting residual microbes compared to conventional ART.[130]/2017

Fluoride-releasing resin compositeIn vitroThe groups were as follows: intervention group (F having adhesive resin) and control.The materials used in test group were not effective in prevention of WSL.[131]/2017

Fluoridated milk In vivo/in vitroVolunteers used an intraoral appliance. They dipped it in fluoridated milk for 5 minutes and once every other day drank the same milk.Drinking fluoridated milk once per day prevented enamel demineralization.[132]/2018

Toothbrush with paste and Munident In vivoThe groups were as follows: normal TP and Munident.Munident (herbal) TP group had significantly lower S. mutans.[133]/2017

Fluoride TP and GC Tooth Mousse In vivoThe groups were as follows: fluoride TP, CPP-ACP crème, and fluoride TP + CPP-ACP crème.All groups had the same results; combination groups did not have additive benefits.[134]/2020

MIPP and Er: YAG laserIn vitroThe groups were as follows: (a) MIPP; (b) Er: YAG laser; (c) MIPP + Er: YAG laser; (d) saliva; (e) control.Group c was the most effective group in the treatment of WSLs.[135]/2020

Probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteriIn vivoThe groups were as follows: probiotic lozenge and Pl lozenge.Probiotic lozenges did not prevent progressing of WSL.[136]/2016

RMGI cement varnishIn vivoThe varnish was applied to teeth.Application of RMGI cement varnish could be useful in preventing WSLs.[137]/2015

Probiotic Streptococcus dentisaniIn vivoThe probiotic was applied in a buccoadhesive gel.S. dentisani was able to buffer oral pH, especially after multiple dosing.[138]/2020

Semiannual fluoride varnish applicationIn vivoThe groups were as follows: typical oral health program with or without FV twice a year.Applications of FV + typical oral health program did not decrease caries progress.[139]/2016

CPP-ACPIn vivoThe groups were as follows: test group receiving CPP-ACP paste monthly and control group.Test group had lower WSL compared to the control patients.[140]/2016

Peptide P11-4In vivoThe groups were as follows: P11-4 or FV.Application of P11-4 significantly reduced the size of early carious lesions. This reduction was higher than fluoride varnish application.[24]/2020

CHX MR and neem MRIn vivoThe groups were as follows: group a: CHX MR; group b: neem MR; group c: control.Both MR significantly decreased PI index.[141]/2017

TiF4 VIn vivo/in vitroTiF4, NaF (2.45% F), or control (Pl V).TiF4 V was the only treatment able to improve enamel remineralization.[142]/2017

Fluoride and sodium hexametaphosphate in toothpasteIn vivo/in vitroTP having 1100 ppm F and 1100F + HMP1% and Pl.TP containing HMP1% was more effective than TP containing 1100F in decreasing demineralization.[143]/2015

Toothpaste Apadent Total Care medical nanohydroxyapatiteIn vivoVolunteers used Apadent Total Care toothpaste with nano-calcium hydroxyapatite.Application of toothpaste with nanohydroxyapatite showed the improvement of all indices.[144]/2016

Protective chlorhexidine varnish layer over resin-infiltrated proximal carious lesionsIn vivoThe groups were as follows: in the test group infiltration + double layer of chlorhexidine varnish was used and in the control group only infiltration was used.Results suggest application of chlorhexidine varnish layer on resin infiltration when surface had microcavitation.[145]/2016

AgNO3 solution and FVIn vivoThe groups were as follows: (1) AgNO3 solution (25%) + FV; (2) SDF (38%) + Pl V.Results suggest application of AgNO3/NaF for management of ECC.[146]/2015

Tooth MousseThe groups were as follows: CPP-ACP (daily) and control.CPP-ACP reduced Streptococcus mutans in test group.[147]/2016

Fluoride rinseThe groups were as follows: sodium F + amine F; control.Application of fluoride rinse helps prevent demineralization.[148]/2015