[Retracted] Efficacy of Otomicroscopy Combined with Otoendoscopy Double-Lens Technology-Assisted Tympanic Membrane Repair on Elderly Patients with Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media
Table 3
Comparison of incidence of adverse reactions and hearing improvement rate of the three groups.
Group
n
Adverse reactions
Incidence of adverse reactions
Average air-bone conduction difference
Hearing improvement rate
Reperforation
Infection
Tympanic membrane displacement
Dizziness
Preoperation
Postoperation
Otomicroscopy group
40
6
3
1
2
12 (30.00)
22.11 ± 5.89
14.72 ± 4.97
31 (77.50)
Otoendoscopy group
40
2
1
1
1
5 (12.50)
21.69 ± 6.44
15.42 ± 4.16
32 (80.00)
Double-lens group
40
1
0
1
1
3 (7.50)
22.71 ± 5.13
12.31 ± 4.21
39 (97.50)
Note. Compared with the otomicroscopy group, . Compared with the otoendoscopy group, .
