Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome of Patients after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Table 2
Anesthetic consumption and complications after surgery.
Variables
Sham TEAS (n = 30)
TEAS (n = 30)
value
SIRS (n (%))
9 (30)
2 (6.67)
0.023#
Propofol (mg, mean ± SD)
625.7 ± 261.4
469.2 ± 181.7
0.016#
Remifentanil (μg, mean ± SD)
1107.5 ± 327.4
878.7 ± 177.4
0.023#
Volume of rehydration (min, mean ± SD)
234.2 ± 73.3
228.5 ± 81.2
0.734
Hypothermia (n (%))
17 (32.7)
15 (27.8)
0.582
Hyperthermia (n (%))
8 (15.4)
8 (14.8)
0.935
Hypotension (n (%))
14 (26.9)
6 (11.1)
0.042#
Hypertension (n (%))
15 (28.8)
5 (9.3)
0.012#
Emergence agitation (n (%))
14 (26.9)
5 (9.3)
0.018#
PONV (n (%))
15 (28.8)
6 (11.1)
0.022#
Vertigo (n (%))
13 (25)
10 (18.5)
0.418
Sleepiness (n (%))
14 (26.7)
9 (16.7)
0.200
Skin itch (n (%))
7 (13.5)
5 (9.3)
0.495
Remedy analgesic (mg, mean ± SD)
142.5 ± 23.6
87.5 ± 10.2
0.028#
Hospital stay (days, mean ± SD)
6.43 ± 2.15
5.31 ± 1.13
0.072
Note. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or n (%). TEAS, transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation; PACU, postanesthesia care unit; PONV, nausea and vomiting. , compared with group sham TEAS.
