Review Article

Investigation on the Efficiency of Tonic Chinese Herbal Injections for Treating Dilated Cardiomyopathy Based on Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Odds ratio/mean difference (95% CIs) of various interventions for all interventions.

InterventionThe clinical effective rateLeft ventricular ejection fraction6-minute walk testLeft ventricular end-diastolic dimensionHeart rateCardiac output

Huangqi injection+WM versus
Shenfu injection + WM1.32 (0.63, 2.77)−3.03 (−14.61, 9.05)9.73 (30.64, 51.04)
Shengmai injection + WM1.10 (0.52, 2.31)0.33 (−11.01, 11.62)8.08 (−31.68, 48.92)
Shenmai injection + WM1.14 (0.62, 2.11)−0.06 (−12.70, 13.15)
Shenqi Fuzheng injection + WM−3.07 (−23.08, 16.11)
Yiqifumai injection + WM−2.59 (−23.88, 18.61)
WM0.28 (0.16, 0.48)4.35 (−6.35, 15.39)2.33 (−36.19, 48.92)

Shenfu injection+WM versus
Shengmai injection + WM0.83 (0.40, 1.72)3.43 (−3.04, 9.22)3.30 (−43.76, 50.75)−0.82 (−9.73, 8.41)−1.75 (−19.17, 15.46)−0.06 (−2.50, 2.49)
Shenmai injection + WM0.87 (0.44, 1.64)3.04 (−5.68, 11.62)23.68 (−60.90, 117.00)1.22 (−10.09, 12.33)−0.18 (−3.33, 2.85)
Shenqi Fuzheng injection + WM−0.11 (−17.75, 16.76)
Yiqifumai injection + WM0.27 (−18.05, 19.07)25.02 (−47.42, 101.60)−3.03 (−20.58, 14.69)
WM0.21 (0.12, 0.34)7.43 (2.41, 12.38)50.39 (25.78, 76.33)−3.37 (−10.95, 4.39)−7.55 (−20.73, 5.86)0.48 (−1.22, 2.51)

Shengmai injection+WM versus
Shenmai injection + WM1.05 (0.54, 2.07)−0.37 (−7.75, 7.38)20.95 (−71.87, 122.00)1.99 (−7.90, 11.50)−0.12 (−3.24, 2.78)
Shenqi Fuzheng injection + WM−3.42 (−20.29, 13.08)
Yiqifumai injection + WM−3.06 (−20.89, 15.47)22.42 (−60.02, 105.10)−2.29 (−18.64, 14.20)
WM0.26 (0.15, 0.43)3.88 (1.10, 8.05)46.43 (5.27, 88.48)−2.47 (−7.92, 2.27)−5.79 (−16.50, 5.00)0.51 (−1.04, 2.41)

Shenmai injection+WM versus
Shenqi Fuzheng injection + WM−3.10 (−20.97, 14.20)
Yiqifumai injection + WM−2.74 (−20.97, 14.20)1.80 (−114.00, 109.70)−4.03 (−22.14, 13.23)
WM0.24 (0.16, 0.37)4.36 (−2.47, 11.31)26.47 (−65.86, 109.60)−4.53 (−12.86, 3.91)0.65 (−1.62, 3.38)

Shenqi Fuzheng injection+WM versus
Yiqifumai injection + WM0.60 (−23.54, 24.96)
WM7.48 (−8.75, 24.20)

Yiqifumai injection+WM versus
WM7.13 (−10.87, 24.71)24.37 (−46.95, 95.41)−0.31 (−16.01, 15.41)24.37 (−46.95, 95.41)

Bold results indicate statistical significance.