Research Article
Activity Screening of the Herb Caesalpinia sappan and an Analysis of Its Antitumor Effects
Table 4
Tumor weight and IR2 (n = 10, mean ± SD).
| Group | Administration routes | Dose (mg/kg) | Tumor weight (g) | IR2 (%) |
| Control group | i.p. + i.g. | — | 1.607 ± 0.6241 | — |
| FU group | i.p. | 83 | 0.352 ± 0.1862 | 78.09 |
| i.p. group | i.p. | 65 | 0.624 ± 0.4143 | 61.16 | 20 | 1.000 ± 0.6528 | 37.77 |
| i.g. group | i.g. | 325 | 0.707 ± 0.6373 | 56.01 | 100 | 0.995 ± 0.7709 | 38.08 |
|
|
Note: compared with the control group, , , and . |