Research Article
Effect of Evidence-Based Diet Nursing on Intestinal Flora and Maternal and Infant Prognosis in Patients with Gestational Diabetes
Table 1
Comparison of general data of the two groups of patients.
| | Project | The control group (n = 65) | The observation group (n = 65) |
| | Age (y) | 28.56 ± 3.65 | 28.49 ± 3.25 | | Gestational week (week) | 29.74 ± 2.15 | 29.83 ± 2.31 | | Pregnancy (second rate) | 2.12 ± 0.53 | 2.18 ± 0.48 | | Body mass index (kg/m2) | 28.45 ± 2.36 | 28.51 ± 2.42 |
| | Maternity type | Primipara | 48 (73.85) | 44 (67.69) | | Multiparous | 17 (26.15) | 21 (32.31) |
| | Maternity occupation | Light stamina | 40 (61.54) | 41 (63.08) | | Medium stamina | 25 (38.46) | 24 (36.92) |
| | Total household income (moon) | ＜3000 yuan | 11 (16.92) | 8 (12.31) | | 3000–6000 yuan | 26 (40.00) | 25 (38.46) | | ＞6000 yuan | 28 (43.08) | 32 (49.23) |
| | Educational level | Junior high school and below | 7 (10.77) | 6 (9.23) | | High school and college | 38 (58.46) | 37 (56.92) | | Undergraduate and above | 20 (30.77) | 22 (33.85) |
| | Frequency of bowel movements (week) | ≤2 second rate | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | | 3–5 second rate | 17 (26.15) | 20 (30.77) | | 6–7 second rate | 42 (64.62) | 39 (60.00) | | ≥8 second rate | 6 (9.23) | 6 (9.23) |
| | Diet | Dietary calorie intake (× 106 J/d) | 4.45 ± 2.26 | 4.50 ± 2.31 | | Percentage of protein intake (%) | 19.02 ± 2.85 | 18.95 ± 3.01 | | Carbohydrate intake percentage (%) | 44.22 ± 8.23 | 43.98 ± 8.96 | | Percentage of fat intake (%) | 36.85 ± 5.23 | 37.02 ± 5.11 | | Vegetable intake (g/d) | 362.55 ± 75.26 | 354.11 ± 81.65 |
|
|
Compared with the control group, . |
