Research Article
[Retracted] Comparative Study on the Clinical Effects of Different Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
Table 1
Comparison of clinical data of three groups (
n, %,
±
s).
| | Clinical data | LAP group (n = 20) | EFR group (n = 27) | ESD group (n = 58) | F/χ2 value | value |
| | Age | 59.61 ± 5.17 | 60.08 ± 4.94 | 58.93 ± 5.20 | 0.493 | 0.611 |
| | Gender | | | | 0.309 | 0.857 | | Male | 8 (40.00%) | 13 (48.15%) | 26 (44.83%) | | | | Female | 12 (60.00%) | 14 (51.85%) | 32 (55.17%) | | | | Tumor diameter (cm) | 3.42 ± 0.81 | 1.97 ± 0.54 | 1.60 ± 0.36 | 91.923 | <0.001 |
| | Tumor location | | | | 5.476 | 0.706 | | Fundus of the stomach | 9 (45.00%) | 13 (48.15%) | 32 (55.17%) | | | | Gastric body | 5 (25.00%) | 6 (22.22%) | 14 (24.14%) | | | | Gastric antrum | 1 (5.00%) | 2 (7.41%) | 6 (10.34%) | | | | Junction of the fundus of stomach and gastric body | 3 (15.00%) | 2 (7.41%) | 4 (6.90%) | | | | Cardia | 2 (10.00%) | 4 (14.81%) | 2 (3.45%) | | |
| | Mitosis | | | | 0.589 | 0.745 | | ≤5/50 HPF | 18 (90.00%) | 25 (92.59%) | 55 (94.83%) | | | | >5/50 HPF | 2 (10.00%) | 2 (7.41%) | 3 (5.17%) | | |
| | Risk degree classification | | | | 19.612 | 0.003 | | Very low danger | 2 (10.00%) | 16 (59.26%) | 36 (62.07%) | | | | Low danger | 11 (55.00%) | 8 (29.63%) | 16 (27.59%) | | | | Moderate danger | 6 (30.00%) | 2 (7.41%) | 6 (10.34%) | | | | High danger | 1 (5.00%) | 1 (3.70%) | 0 (0.00%) | | |
|
|
