Research Article
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Xiao Yao San as a Treatment for Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Table 1
Included study characteristics.
| Study cohort | No (T/C) | Gender | Age | Course (day) | Outcome | T | C | T | C |
| Chen and Lj [17] | 81/78 | 40/41 | 40/38 | 43.65 ± 8.01 | 43.93 ± 10.56 | 42 | ①②⑤ | Deng [18] | 59/57 | 26/33 | 30/27 | 43.81 ± 10.23 | 44.53 ± 11.65 | 28 | ①②⑥ | Ding [19] | 37/38 | — | — | 29.46 ± 6.82 | 27.62 ± 4.24 | 56 | ①②③ | Li [20] | 100/50 | — | — | — | — | 56 | ①⑥ | Li [20] | 32/32 | 15/17 | 14/18 | 41.6 ± 7.8 | 42.1 ± 7.2 | 42 | ①②⑥ | Li [21] | 30/30 | 22/8 | 19/11 | 43–79 | 41–80 | 28 | ①⑥ | Wang [22] | 32/31 | 18/14 | 20/11 | 19–57 | 20–56 | 56 | ①② | Wang [23] | 30/30 | 16/14 | 15/15 | 18–48 | 20–51 | 42 | ①②⑥ | Zhu [24] | 28/28 | — | — | — | — | 42 | ①②④ |
|
|
Note: outcome: ① efficiency; ② HAMA; ③ SAS; ④ TESS; ⑤ symptom rating scale of TCM; ⑥ adverse reaction rate; —: unclear.
|