Research Article
The Effects of Ficus carica on Male and Female Reproductive Capabilities in Rats
Table 6
Hormonal comparison of male and female rats in the F0 generation.
| Parameters | Control | FC 50 mg | FC 100 mg |
| GnRH male (lU/ml) | 6.02 ± 0.08 | 6.17 ± 0.18 | 6.68 ± 0.17 | GnRH female (lU/ml) | 6.62 ± 0.82 | 6.62 ± 0.82 | 6.735 ± 0.81 | FSH male (lU/ml) | 0.43 ± 0.28 | 0.92 ± 0.11 | 1.80 ± 0.26 | FSH female (lU/ml) | 1.49 ± 0.30 | 5.09 ± 0.59 | 5.24 ± 0.57 | LH male (lU/ml) | 0.36 ± 0.06 | 0.62 ± 0.08 | 1.41 ± 0.28 | LH female (lU/ml) | 0.80 ± 0.009 | 3.18 ± 0.81 | 3.48 ± 0.77 | Estradiol male (Pg/ml) | 24.53 ± 3.20 | 35.38 ± 2.90 | 40.38 ± 2.81 | Estradiol female (Pg/ml) | 23.23 ± 2.68 | 48.3 ± 3.25 | 56.42 ± 3.09 | Testosterone male (ng/ml) | 0.83 ± 0.12 | 1.400 ± 0.27 | 1.45 ± 0.27 | Testosterone female (ng/ml) | 0.72 ± 0.008 | 0.95 ± 0.09 | 0.95 ± 0.07 | DHT male (ng/dl) | 18.00 ± 2.30 | 29.00 ± 2.65 | 35.00 ± 2.88 | DHT female (ng/dl) | 28.35 ± 3.29 | 29.15 ± 3.39 | 34.3 ± 2.76 | DHEAS male (umol/l) | 2.25 ± 0.29 | 7.01 ± 0.29 | 8.29 ± 0.27 | DHEAS female (umol/l) | 1.79 ± 0.26 | 5.65 ± 0.58 | 10.33 ± 2.88 | Progesterone male (mg/ml) | 12.42 ± 1.63 | 15.24 ± 1.56 | 13.09 ± 0.93 | Progesterone female (mg/ml) | 10.30 ± 1.47 | 10.73 ± 1.50 | 9.72 ± 1.16 | Insulin male (IU/ml) | 8.23 ± 0.49 | 13.11 ± 0.93 | 15.21 ± 1.38 | Insulin female (IU/ml) | 9.22 ± 1.33 | 9.34 ± 0.57 | 9.83 ± 0.57 | Prolactin female ng/ml | 7.38 ± 1.16 | 11.29 ± 1.32 | 25.59 ± 1.32 |
|
|
n = 6, data are shown as means ± SEM. deliberated as highly significant and as significant. |