Research Article
The Effects of Ficus carica on Male and Female Reproductive Capabilities in Rats
Table 7
Hormonal comparison of male and female rats in the F1 generation.
| Parameters | Control | FC 50 mg | FC 100 mg |
| GnRH male (lU/ml) | 6.29 ± 0.93 | 6.57 ± 0.81 | 7.38 ± 0.56 | GnRH female (lU/ml) | 7.64 ± 0.61 | 6.91 ± 0.82 | 7.06 ± 0.57 | FSH male (lU/ml) | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 1.15 ± 0.22 | FSH female (lU/ml) | 1.18 ± 0.24 | 1.93 ± 0.28 | 3.97 ± 0.29 | LH male (lU/ml) | 0.32 ± 0.029 | 0.72 ± 0.06 | 0.68 ± 0.08 | LH female (lU/ml) | 1.14 ± 0.14 | 1.64 ± 0.29 | 1.82 ± 0.28 | Estradiol male (Pg/ml) | 19.17 ± 2.55 | 23.67 ± 2.80 | 25.83 ± 3.016 | Estradiol female (Pg/ml) | 18.06 ± 1.17 | 44.85 ± 1.45 | 50.05 ± 2.89 | Testosterone male (ng/ml) | 1.17 ± 0.13 | 1.04 ± 0.14 | 1.34 ± 0.13 | Testosterone female (ng/ml) | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 0.86 ± 0.19 | 0.99 ± 0.19 | DHT male (ng/dl) | 18.33 ± 1.28 | 21.33 ± 1.60 | 24.5 ± 2.92 | DHT female (ng/dl) | 27.84 ± 1.17 | 28.84 ± 1.08 | 29.84 ± 1.08 | DHEAS male (umol/l) | 2.9 ± 0.28 | 6.81 ± 0.28 | 6.99 ± 0.28 | DHEAS female (umol/l) | 1.04 ± 0.03 | 5.63 ± 0.80 | 7.34 ± 0.89 | Progesterone male (mg/ml) | 11.45 ± 0.59 | 11.83 ± 0.54 | 12.02 ± 0.58 | Progesterone female (mg/ml) | 8.22 ± 1.07 | 8.79 ± 0.01 | 8.32 ± 1.07 | Insulin male (IU/ml) | 8.25 ± 0.67 | 9.11 ± 0.57 | 9.47 ± 0.68 | Insulin female (IU/ml) | 8.31 ± 0.47 | 8.59 ± 0.28 | 8.59 ± 0.62 | Prolactin female ng/ml | 6.52 ± 0.82 | 6.47 ± 0.82 | 6.02 ± 0.58 |
|
|
n = 6, data are shown as means ± SEM. deliberated as highly significant and as significant. |