11,12-Diacetyl-carnosol Protects SH-SY5Y Cells from Hydrogen Peroxide Damage through the Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway

Luo, Qingyi; Hu, Weiyan; Yu, Haofei; Zhang, Rongping; Chen, Xinglong

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4376812

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Abbreviations Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 4376812 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4376812

11,12-Diacetyl-carnosol Protects SH-SY5Y Cells from Hydrogen Peroxide Damage through the Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway

Qingyi Luo,^1,2,3Weiyan Hu,³Haofei Yu,³Rongping Zhang,⁴and Xinglong Chen⁴

Academic Editor: Daniela Russo

Received17 Dec 2021

Accepted25 Apr 2022

Published17 May 2022

Abstract

Background. Oxidative stress-induced neurotoxicity plays a key role in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). 11,12-Diacetyl-carnosol (NO.20), an acetylated derivative of carnosol extracted from rosemary, displays a high antioxidative effect in vitro. Purpose. We investigated the neuroprotective effect of NO.20 on H₂O₂-induced neurotoxicity in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells and its possible mechanism. Results. We found that NO.20 pretreatment (1 μM for 1 h) had cytoprotective effects and weakened H₂O₂-induced damage in SH-SY5Y cells by reducing viability loss, apoptotic rate, and reactive oxygen species production. In addition, NO.20 inhibited H₂O₂-induced mitochondrial dysfunctions: it alleviated mitochondrial membrane potential loss and cytochrome c release, decreased the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, and reduced caspase-3 expression. NO.20 also downregulated malondialdehyde and upregulated glutathione. Furthermore, NO.20 pretreatment caused the nuclear translocation of the transcription factor NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), increasing heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) expression in SH-SY5Y cells. Notably, we found that silencing Nrf2 using small interfering RNA (siRNA) suppressed the NO.20-induced HO-1 expression and abolished the neuroprotective effect of NO.20. Conclusion. These results demonstrate that NO.20 protects SH-SY5Y cells from H₂O₂-induced neurotoxicity by activating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Thus, the neuroprotective and antioxidative stress effects of NO.20 may make it a promising neuroprotective compound for AD treatment.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia, is a chronic age-related neurodegenerative brain disorder that often leads to the gradual loss of memory, language, and cognitive functions and causes severe emotional and behavioral abnormalities [1]. Without an efficient treatment, the number of AD patients worldwide could reach 100 million by 2050 [2]. However, no effective treatments have been discovered due to the complex factors involved in this disease’s pathogenesis. The drugs used currently can only treat the symptoms of AD by improving behavioral and cognitive impairments but do little to stop its progression [3]. Therefore, new effective anti-AD drugs with minimal side effects are urgently needed.

Although AD occurrence involves multiple factors, several lines of evidence suggest that oxidative stress-induced neuronal damage and death play a crucial role in AD progression [4]. Oxidative stress involves reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction, which damages the structure and function of various biomolecules: ROS cleaves DNA, oxidizes proteins, peroxidizes lipids, and changes signal transductions, eventually leading to cell dysfunction and apoptosis [5]. Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) is a major ROS produced during the redox process; it is commonly used to induce oxidative stress in cellular models [6]. Thus, discovering novel compounds that protect neurons from H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress could lead to AD treatments.

Nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is an essential transcription factor regulating the expression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), antioxidant enzymes, and other cytoprotective genes. Upregulating HO-1 expression protects cells against oxidative stress [7]. Therefore, researchers agree that HO-1 induction is a common feature of many neurodegenerative diseases and regard Nrf2 and HO-1 as essential targets in AD treatment.

Rosmarinus officinalis L. (rosemary) is a perennial herb of the Labiatae family native to Europe and the Mediterranean region; it has long been cultivated in China [8]. Rosemary exerts numerous biological effects, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, antiadipogenic, antiapoptotic, and neuroprotective effects [9, 10]. Thus, rosemary is a prominent source of novel drug candidates. In recent years, the interest in novel rosemary neuroprotective agents has grown [11]. Previous studies on rosemary mainly focused on its main chemical components, rosmarinic acid, carnosic acid, and carnosol and confirmed their neuroprotective effect. For example, carnosol can protect BV2 microglia and PC12 cells from H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress by upregulating Nrf2, which increases HO-1 expression [12].

Besides the known flavonoids, terpenoids, phenols, and others [13, 14], does rosemary contain other neuroprotective compounds? Our team has been working on the isolation and biological evaluation of rosemary components for many years, and we recently identified nine new and nineteen known compounds from its active fraction using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Among them, an abietane diterpenoid (11,12-diacetyl-carnosol, NO.20) has attracted our attention. This acetylated carnosol derivative displayed a potent antioxidative effect without apparent cytotoxicity—its cell viability rate was above 80%, even higher than that of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) [15]. In view of this, this acetylated derivative (NO.20) with high biological activity and stability may be used as a new source for the development of new antioxidant agents for AD treatment. However, its specific molecular antioxidant mechanism is still unclear.

This study aimed to investigate the protective effects of the abietane diterpenoid compound NO.20 on H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress damage in SH-SY5Y cells and its possible neuroprotective mechanisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

We extracted and separated NO.20 with a purity of more than 98% in our laboratory. Figure 1 shows the chemical structure. Its molecular formula is C₂₄H₃₀O₆ and relative molecular weight is 413.1958. We obtained the plastic materials used in cell culture from Corning, Inc. (NY, USA). We purchased H₂O₂ from Sigma (MO, USA), Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) from Labjic Biotechnology Company (Beijing, China), and EGCG from Meilun Biotechnology Company (Dalian, China).

2.2. Cell Culture

We obtained human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells from the Cell Bank of the Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and cultured them in DMEM/F12 HAM (1 : 1) (Hy clone, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biological Industries, USA) and 5% penicillin/streptomycin solution (Hyclone, USA) in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO₂ at 37°C.

2.3. CCK-8 Cell Viability Assay

We seeded the cells into 96-well plates at 5 × 10³ cells/well. We exposed the cells to different compounds and EGCG at 1 μM and 25 μM for 1 h after 24 h of subculture, added H₂O₂ at 300 μM, and incubated for another 24 h to induce cytotoxicity and mitochondrial impairments. We then removed the culture medium, added 100 μl of DMEM/F12 (1 : 1) and 10 μl of CCK-8, incubated for 1 h at 37°C, and finally measured the absorbance at 450 nm using an automated microplate reader (TUR-BIO, USA). For each treatment condition, we repeated all experiments at least three times.

2.4. Measurement of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential

We assessed mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) by staining SH-SY5Y cells with JC-1 and examining them through flow cytometry. We treated the cells with NO.20 and H₂O₂ as described above. We then incubated them in a culture medium containing 10 μg/ml JC-1 (Enzo Bioscience) for 20 min at 37°C and centrifuged them for 3 min at 2000 g. We analyzed the cell samples with a flow cytometer (Rato Company, USA) after washing them with PBS. We excited JC-1 at 488 nm and measured its fluorescence intensity at 535 nm (PE-A) and 518 nm (FITC-A).

2.5. Cytochrome C Release Quantification

We measured cytochrome c release levels as previously reported [16].

2.6. ROS Quantification

We measured intracellular ROS levels using the fluorescent probe 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) assay kit as described previously [17].

2.7. NO, Glutathione (GSH), and Malondialdehyde (MDA) Quantification

We measured NO, GSH, and MDA levels in SH-SY5Y cells using commercial kits (Abcam, MA, USA) as previously reported [18, 19].

2.8. Quantification of Apoptotic Cells by TUNEL Staining

To quantify apoptotic cells, we prepared a TUNEL detection solution as previously reported [19].

2.9. Bcl-2, Bax, Caspase-3, Cytochrome C, Nrf2, and HO-1 Quantification by Western Blot Analysis

We extracted nucleoproteins and total cell proteins using a nucleocytoplasmic protein extraction kit and performed SDS-PAGE. We then transferred the proteins to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes and blocked them using 5% bovine serum albumin at room temperature for 2 h. We then added Bcl-2, Bax, caspase-3, cytochrome c, Nrf2, and HO-1 antibodies and incubated overnight at 4°C. Next, we washed the samples with TBST three times, incubated them with diluted secondary anti-rabbit IgG antibody at room temperature for 2 h, and then washed them with TBST three times before color imaging.

2.10. Nrf2 Knockdown by siRNA Transfection

We silenced Nrf2 by transfecting SH-SY5Y cells with Nrf2 siRNA or negative control siRNA following the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies, CA, USA) [20].

2.11. Statistical Analyses

All data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. We performed one-way and two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.0 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA, https://www.graphpad.com. In the ANOVA analyses and Student’s t-tests, we considered that indicated statistically significant differences between groups.

3. Results

3.1. NO.20 Prevented Cell Viability Loss and Blocked Apoptosis in SH-SY5Y Cells Exposed to H₂O₂

In this study, we treated the SH-SY5Y cells with 300 μM of H₂O₂ for 24 h, as we previously determined that this dose reduced their viability by about 50% [15]. We then assessed the protective effects of NO.20 on H₂O₂-treated SH-SY5Y cells using the CCK-8 assay. As shown in Figure 2, NO.20 pretreatment for 1 h at 1 μM and 25 μM before H₂O₂ exposition (300 μM) efficiently prevented viability loss, in a dose-dependent manner, while H₂O₂ alone significantly decreased cell viability (). NO.20 alone (at either concentration) did not affect the viability of SH-SY5Y cells. NO.20 showed a neuroprotective effect and no cytotoxicity. Its antioxidative effect was higher than that of EGCG (positive control) [15]. Therefore, we used 1 μM as the NO.20 concentration in the subsequent experiments.

As shown in Figure 3, NO.20 prevented apoptosis in H₂O₂-treated SH-SY5Y cells. The cytochrome c levels were higher in cells treated with H₂O₂ alone than in control cells, and NO.20 pretreatment abrogated the H₂O₂-induced cytochrome c release to the cytosol (Figure 3(a)). Thus, NO.20 maintained the mitochondrial cytochrome c levels (Figure 3(b)). Furthermore, NO.20 pretreatment suppressed H₂O₂-induced apoptosis by blocking the decrease in Bax (Figure 3(c)) and the increase in Bcl-2 (Figure 3(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Cells treated with H₂O₂ alone displayed higher caspase-3 activity than control cells, and NO.20 pretreatment decreased this activity (Figure 3(e)). To confirm these results, we performed TUNEL staining and assessed the antiapoptosis effect of NO.20 (Figure 4(a)). This test showed that pretreating SH-SY5Y cells with 1 μM NO.20 significantly reduced H₂O₂-induced apoptosis (Figure 4(b)).

(a)

(b)

3.2. NO.20 Elicited an Antioxidant Effect on H₂O₂-Treated SH-SY5Y Cells

Next, we examined whether NO.20 had an antioxidant effect on H₂O₂-treated SH-SY5Y cells. Treating SH-SY5Y cells with H₂O₂ elevated their ROS levels. However, NO.20 pretreatment effectively prevented this ROS level elevation (Figure 5(a)). Additionally, NO.20 significantly reduced NO production in H₂O₂-treated SH-SY5Y cells (Figure 5(b)). We then quantified cellular and mitochondrial GSH levels. NO.20 prevented the H₂O₂-induced decrease in GSH levels (Figure 5(c)), while increasing mitochondrial GSH levels (Figure 5(d)). Consequently, NO.20 abrogated the H₂O₂-induced MDA level increase (Figure 5(e)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

3.3. NO.20 Protected H₂O₂-Treated SH-SY5Y Cells through the Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway

To further investigate the mechanism by which NO.20 protected H₂O₂-treated cells, we transfected SH-SY5Y cells with Nrf2 siRNA 24 h before NO.20 treatment in the present experimental model. We then quantified nuclear Nrf2 accumulation by Western blotting. The immunofluorescence staining showed that under normal conditions, Nrf2 was located in the cytoplasm, while NO.20-stimulated cells had significantly higher nuclear Nrf2 levels. Thus, NO.20 could promote the nuclear transfer of Nrf2 (Figure 6(a)). The Western blot also showed that siRNA transfection prevented the nuclear translocation of Nrf2 in cells pretreated with NO.20 (Figures 6(b) and 6(c)). Moreover, we found that NO.20 increased HO-1 expression, while knocking down Nrf2 markedly decreased it (Figures 6(b) and 6(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 6

Effects of NO.20 pretreatment on Nrf2/HO-1 pathway-related gene expression. (a) Immunofluorescent staining for Nrf2 nuclear translocation with or without Nrf2 siRNA transfection. Nrf2 appears in green (200× magnification, scale bar = 10 μM). (b) Relative protein expression of components of the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway in SH-SY5Y cells. (c) Quantification of Nrf2 in the nucleus with or without Nrf2 siRNA transfection. (d) Quantification of HO-1 in the nucleus with or without Nrf2 siRNA transfection. The groups were compared by two-way ANOVA analysis, followed by t-tests between group pairs. Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 3). vs. the NC siRNA group.

In summary, these findings confirm that NO.20 activates Nrf2, which upregulates HO-1. Nrf2 silencing also blocked the effects of NO.20 on MMP in H₂O₂-treated SH-SY5Y cells (Figures 7(a) and 7(b)). Finally, we found that NO.20 failed to improve the cell viability in H₂O₂-treated SH-SY5Y cells when Nrf2 was silenced (Figure 7(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

4. Discussion

The present study demonstrates that NO.20 exerts major neuroprotective effects in SH-SY5Y cells through Nrf2. AD is a complex pathological process. As the most critical injury mechanism, oxidative stress is a crucial target in the treatment of such diseases [21, 22]. As one of the main ROS, H₂O₂ is produced during the redox process and is a messenger in intracellular signaling cascades; it can penetrate the cell membrane and react with various biological targets, such as DNA, lipids, and proteins, causing nerve cell damage and even death [23]. Therefore, it has been widely used in oxidative stress-induced apoptosis models [24].

Mitochondria are closely related to apoptosis, and the depolarization of mitochondrial membrane potential is one of the earliest events in the apoptosis reaction cascade [25]. Once the mitochondrial membrane potential collapses, apoptosis is irreversible [26]. This process involves numerous genes and proteins [27]. Thus, the protective mechanism of the mitochondrial pathway could be clarified by detecting changes in ROS, NO, and GSH levels, MMP, and cytochrome c release in SH-SY5Y cells. In the present work, we found that pretreating SH-SY5Y cells with NO.20 before exposure to H₂O₂ prevented mitochondrial dysfunction, cell viability loss, and apoptosis. Our study has shown that H₂O₂ significantly increases ROS levels and damages SH-SY5Y cells. Furthermore, we found that NO.20 pretreatment in SH-SY5Y cells markedly reduced the H₂O₂-induced cell viability loss, ROS production, and NO and MDA levels. NO.20 also upregulated mitochondrial GSH and reduced MDA levels. Finally, it reduced the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria and prevented MMP depolarization. These results reveal that NO.20 exerts its antioxidant protective effect against H₂O₂-induced neurotoxicity by maintaining the stability of the mitochondrial membrane through the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway.

Bcl-2, a member of the Bcl-2 family, is the most important apoptosis suppressor gene in vivo [28]. Thus, increasing Bcl-2 expression can improve the resistance of almost all cells to apoptosis signals [29]. Bax is another proapoptotic Bcl-2 family member. Therefore, the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio plays a key role in cell proliferation and apoptosis regulation. We showed that H₂O₂ downregulated Bcl-2 and upregulated Bax, increasing the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio. In addition, NO.20 pretreatment prevented this effect, suggesting that NO.20 can regulate the apoptosis of SH-SY5Y cells and protect them by coordinating the expression of Bax and Bcl-2. H₂O₂ stimulates and activates the upstream caspases in the apoptotic pathway, then activating caspase-3 [30]. As an apoptotic executor, caspase-3 activates DNA cleavage factors, and activated endonucleases then cleave nuclear DNA, leading to cell death. In this study, NO.20 significantly reduced H₂O₂-induced caspase-3 expression, suggesting that NO.20 exerts its protective effect on H₂O₂-induced SH-SY5Y cell damage by inhibiting caspase-3 expression. Overall, these results suggest that NO.20 pretreatment prevented H₂O₂-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells.

ROS can activate many transcription factors, including Nrf2 [31]. Nrf2 is an essential nuclear transcription factor in the body’s antioxidant stress pathway; it plays a crucial role in activating the expression of various genes related to cell protection and detoxification and plays a vital role in cell defense [32]. Notably, the Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway is a common molecular target for natural products. Under normal conditions, Nrf2 forms a covalent complex with Keap1 through an intermolecular disulfide bond, and Keap1 maintains Nrf2 in the cytoplasm. Oxidation or modification of this specific Keap1 cysteine releases Nrf2, which travels from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and reacts with antioxidant response elements. This process can activate the expression of antioxidant genes, activate the transcription of phase II detoxification enzymes and antioxidant enzyme-related genes, regulate numerous downstream molecules, induce the expression of a variety of antioxidant substances—including HO-1—and participate in the regulation of the oxidative stress response [33]. Thus, HO-1 induction is an important target of oxidative stress drugs.

We next investigated whether the antioxidant activities of NO.20 could be related to its ability to induce HO-1 expression. NO.20 pretreatment resulted in the nuclear translocation of Nrf2 and increased HO-1 protein expression, suggesting that HO-1 expression depends on Nrf2 activation. To identify the signaling pathways by which NO.20 activates Nrf2 and induces HO-1 expression, we knocked down Nrf2. We confirmed that NO.20 activated Nrf2 and induced HO-1 expression. Furthermore, we found that NO.20 pretreatment induced Nrf2 translocation into the nucleus and increased HO-1 expression. Knocking down Nrf2 abrogated these effects. Therefore, we postulate that the antioxidant and neuroprotective activities of NO.20 are largely dependent on HO-1 induction. Finally, NO.20 displayed a beneficial neuroprotective effect in an H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress damage in vitro model.

In conclusion, the current study is the first to report the neuroprotective effects of the abietane diterpenoid compound NO.20 (11,12-diacetyl-carnosol) extracted from rosemary. Our results suggest that the new compound exerts its antioxidant activities through the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Based on the mentioned evidence, this new natural product with neuroprotective properties could help develop new drugs against AD. However, further studies are necessary to optimize the structure of the new compound, and in vivo experiments are also indispensable.

Abbreviations

AD:	Alzheimer’s disease
EGCG:	Epigallocatechin gallate
GSH:	Glutathione
HO-1:	Heme oxygenase-1
MDA:	Malondialdehyde
MMP:	Mitochondrial membrane potential
NO.20:	11,12-Diacetyl-carnosol
Nrf2:	Nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2
ROS:	Reactive oxygen species
NC:	Negative control.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Rongping Zhang and Xinglong Chen contributed to the conception of the study and helped perform the analysis with constructive discussion. Qingyi Luo, Weiyan Hu, and Haofei Yu performed the experiments, contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation, and performed the data analyses. Qingyi Luo wrote the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all staff members of the Yunnan Key Laboratory of Pharmacology for Natural Products for their technical support. This study was financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81960666), the Program of Poisonous Medicinal Plant Research Innovation Team in Yunnan Province (2020HC008), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32160107).

References

M. L. Garcez, A. C. Falchetti, F. Mina, and J. Budni, “Alzheimer’s disease associated with psychiatric comorbidities,” Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, vol. 87, no. 2 Suppl, pp. 1461–1473, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Cavalli, M. L. Bolognesi, A. Minarini et al., “Multi-target-directed ligands to combat neurodegenerative diseases,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 7, p. 2326, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Misra and B. Medhi, “Drug development status for Alzheimer’s disease: present scenario,” Neurological Sciences, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 831–839, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. W. Marlatt, P. J. Lucassen, G. Perry, M. A. Smith, and X. Zhu, “Alzheimer’s disease: cerebrovascular dysfunction, oxidative stress, and advanced clinical therapies,” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 199–210, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Butterfield, J. Drake, C. Pocernich, and A. Castegna, “Evidence of oxidative damage in Alzheimer’s disease brain: central role for amyloid beta-peptide,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 548–554, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Irannejad, M. Amini, F. Khodagholi et al., “Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of novel 1,2,4-triazine derivatives as neuroprotective agents,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 4224–4230, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Ahmad, H. Zhuang, and S. Doré, “Heme oxygenase-1 protects brain from acute excitotoxicity,” Neuroscience, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 1703–1708, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Martínez, M. E. González-Trujano, M. Chávez, and F. Pellicer, “Antinociceptive effectiveness of triterpenes from rosemary in visceral nociception,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Munné-Bosch and L. Alegre, “Subcellular compartmentation of the diterpene carnosic acid and its derivatives in the leaves of rosemary,” Plant Physiology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 1094–1102, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Satoh, S. R. McKercher, and S. A. Lipton, “Nrf2/ARE-mediated antioxidant actions of pro-electrophilic drugs,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 65, pp. 645–657, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Poeckel, C. Greiner, M. Verhoff et al., “Carnosic acid and carnosol potently inhibit human 5-lipoxygenase and suppress pro-inflammatory responses of stimulated human polymorphonuclear leukocytes,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 91–97, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sarris, A. Panossian, I. Schweitzer, C. Stough, and A. Scholey, “Herbal medicine for depression, anxiety and insomnia: a review of psychopharmacology and clinical evidence,” European Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 841–860, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Foresti, S. K. Bains, T. S. Pitchumony et al., “Small molecule activators of the Nrf2-HO-1 antioxidant axis modulate heme metabolism and inflammation in BV2 microglia cells,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 76, pp. 132–148, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Borrás-Linares, Z. Stojanović, R. Quirantes-Piné et al., “Rosmarinus officinalis leaves as a natural source of bioactive compounds,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 20585–20606, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X.-L. Chen, Q.-Y. Luo, W.-Y. Hu, J.-J. Chen, and R.-P. Zhang, “Abietane diterpenoids with antioxidative damage activity from rosmarinus officinalis,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 68, no. 20, pp. 5631–5640, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, Y. Xu, J. Yan et al., “Acteoside protects human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells against beta-amyloid-induced cell injury,” Brain Research, vol. 1283, pp. 139–147, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-Q. Wang, X.-B. Sun, Y.-X. Xu, H. Zhao, Q.-Y. Zhu, and C.-Q. Zhu, “Astaxanthin upregulates heme oxygenase-1 expression through ERK1/2 pathway and its protective effect against beta-amyloid-induced cytotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells,” Brain Research, vol. 1360, pp. 159–167, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. de Oliveira, R. F. da Rocha, and J. C. F. Moreira, “Increased susceptibility of mitochondria isolated from frontal cortex and hippocampus of vitamin A-treated rats to non-aggregated amyloid-β peptides 1-40 and 1-42,” Acta Neuropsychiatrica, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 101–108, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Wang, L. Zhu, X. Zhu et al., “Protective effect of paeoniflorin on Aβ25-35-induced SH-SY5Y cell injury by preventing mitochondrial dysfunction,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 227–234, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. de Oliveira, P. F. Schuck, and S. M. D. Bosco, “Tanshinone I induces mitochondrial protection through an nrf2-dependent mechanism in paraquat-TreatedHuman neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 4597–4608, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Karpińska and G. Gromadzka, “[Oxidative stress and natural antioxidant mechanisms: the role in neurodegeneration. From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies],” Postępy Higieny I Medycyny Doświadczalnej, vol. 67, pp. 45–53, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Loboda, M. Damulewicz, E. Pyza, A. Jozkowicz, and J. Dulak, “Role of Nrf2/HO-1 system in development, oxidative stress response and diseases: an evolutionarily conserved mechanism,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 73, no. 17, pp. 3221–3247, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Behl, J. B. Davis, R. Lesley, and D. Schubert, “Hydrogen peroxide mediates amyloid beta protein toxicity,” Cell, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 817–827, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. B. Zorov, C. R. Filburn, L.-O. Klotz, J. L. Zweier, and S. J. Sollott, “Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced ROS release: a new phenomenon accompanying induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition in cardiac myocytes,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 192, no. 7, pp. 1001–1014, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Stetler, R. K. Leak, Y. Gao, and J. Chen, “The dynamics of the mitochondrial organelle as a potential therapeutic target,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, B. Xu, L. Liu et al., “Cadmium induction of reactive oxygen species activates the mTOR pathway, leading to neuronal cell death,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 624–632, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. N. Grammatopoulos, K. Morris, C. Bachar, S. Moore, R. Andres, and J. A. Weyhenmeyer, “Angiotensin II attenuates chemical hypoxia-induced caspase-3 activation in primary cortical neuronal cultures,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 297–303, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Harris and C. B. Thompson, “The role of the Bcl-2 family in the regulation of outer mitochondrial membrane permeability,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1182–1191, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Morales, L. GuzmÃ¡n-MartÃnez, C. Cerda-Troncoso, G. A. FarÃas, and R. B. Maccioni, “Neuroinflammation in the pathogenesis of Alzheimerâs disease. A rational framework for the search of novel therapeutic approaches,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 112, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Matsura, M. Kai, Y. Fujii, H. Ito, and K. Yamada, “Hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis in HL-60 cells requires caspase-3 activation,” Free Radical Research, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 73–83, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Singh, K. H. Reeta, U. Sharma, N. R. Jagannathan, A. K. Dinda, and Y. K. Gupta, “Neuro-protective effect of monomethyl fumarate on ischemia reperfusion injury in rats: role of Nrf2/HO1 pathway in peri-infarct region,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 126, pp. 96–108, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. I. Tong, A. Kobayashi, F. Katsuoka, and M. Yamamoto, “Two-site substrate recognition model for the Keap1-Nrf2 system: a hinge and latch mechanism,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 387, no. 10/11, pp. 1311–1320, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Canning, F. J. Sorrell, and A. N. Bullock, “Structural basis of Keap1 interactions with Nrf2,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 88, pp. 101–107, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Qingyi Luo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

11,12-Diacetyl-carnosol Protects SH-SY5Y Cells from Hydrogen Peroxide Damage through the Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

2.2. Cell Culture

2.3. CCK-8 Cell Viability Assay

2.4. Measurement of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential

2.5. Cytochrome C Release Quantification

2.6. ROS Quantification

2.7. NO, Glutathione (GSH), and Malondialdehyde (MDA) Quantification

2.8. Quantification of Apoptotic Cells by TUNEL Staining

2.9. Bcl-2, Bax, Caspase-3, Cytochrome C, Nrf2, and HO-1 Quantification by Western Blot Analysis

2.10. Nrf2 Knockdown by siRNA Transfection

2.11. Statistical Analyses

3. Results

3.1. NO.20 Prevented Cell Viability Loss and Blocked Apoptosis in SH-SY5Y Cells Exposed to H2O2

3.2. NO.20 Elicited an Antioxidant Effect on H2O2-Treated SH-SY5Y Cells

3.3. NO.20 Protected H2O2-Treated SH-SY5Y Cells through the Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway

4. Discussion

Abbreviations

Data Availability

Conflicts of Interest

Authors’ Contributions

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright

3.1. NO.20 Prevented Cell Viability Loss and Blocked Apoptosis in SH-SY5Y Cells Exposed to H₂O₂

3.2. NO.20 Elicited an Antioxidant Effect on H₂O₂-Treated SH-SY5Y Cells

3.3. NO.20 Protected H₂O₂-Treated SH-SY5Y Cells through the Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway