Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Herbal Medicine and Growth Hormone Compared to Growth Hormone Monotherapy for Short Stature Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Shim, Soo Bo; Ahn, Hye Li; Lee, Hyun Hee; Lee, Ju Ah; Lee, Hye Lim

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5725258

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 5725258 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5725258

Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Herbal Medicine and Growth Hormone Compared to Growth Hormone Monotherapy for Short Stature Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Soo Bo Shim,¹Hye Li Ahn,¹Hyun Hee Lee,¹Ju Ah Lee,²and Hye Lim Lee¹

Academic Editor: Jorddy Neves Cruz

Received12 Nov 2021

Accepted19 Jul 2022

Published09 Aug 2022

Abstract

Introduction. Herbal medicines (HM) and growth hormones (GH) are widely used to treat short stature (SS) in children. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy with HM and GH (CHG) compared to those of GH monotherapy (GHM) in children with SS. Methods. We searched 17 electronic databases from inception to 1 April 2021. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Two authors independently performed the selection and quality assessment of the included studies using Cochrane Handbook criteria. Relative risk (RR) was used to measure dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Mean difference (MD) or standard MD (SMD) was used to measure continuous outcomes with a 95% CI. Results. Seven RCTs involving 455 participants with SS were included. Standard deviations in height (MD = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.24–0.38, ), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (MD = 1.39, 95% CI: 0.93–1.85, ) were significantly higher in the CHG group than in the GHM group. Growth velocity (MD = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.34–2.31, ) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (MD = 61.85, 95% CI: 55.80–67.90, ) were significantly higher in the CHG group. Adverse events were significantly lower in the CHG group (risk ratio: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02–0.54, ). However, the level of evidence was low. Conclusions. CHG demonstrated significantly better efficacy than GHM for treating SS, with a low incidence of adverse events. However, since the level of evidence is low, methodologically standardized RCTs are required to verify these results.

1. Introduction

Individuals with short stature (SS) are two or more standard deviations (SDs) shorter than those with an average height of the same age and sex [1]. Approximately, 80% of individuals with SS have idiopathic SS (ISS), without identifiable deficiencies or disorders of growth hormone (GH) and endocrine, organ system, or genetic disorders [2]. Interest in height growth is expanding globally, and studies have reported that shorter height significantly impacts children’s quality of life and depression scores [3, 4]. In particular, studies have reported that ISS can cause emotional issues in children and adolescents and result in socio-psychological and socio-economic effects [5, 6].

In Korea, recombinant human GH injection is a conventional treatment for ISS since the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of GH in 2003 [7]. Several studies have reported that administering GH in patients with ISS is effective in increasing the predicted adult height (PAH) and improving the growth velocity (GV) [8–10]. However, its long-term effects remain controversial [11].

There have been reports of certain side effects of GH, including elevated intracranial pressure, scoliosis, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and type 2 diabetes [12]. It is recommended that side effects should be monitored, and fasting blood sugar and HbA1c levels should be measured every 3–6 months. In contrast, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) should be tested every 6–12 months. Daily injections of GH and frequent follow-up blood tests are additional psychological burdens for children who undergo GH therapy, which often lasts for more than 2 years [12]. Furthermore, it is of concern that the efficacy decreases with prolonged treatment compared with that obtained during the first year of treatment. In Korea, survey results indicate low satisfaction with GH therapy (29.1%), and studies reveal that GH therapy does not positively impact children’s quality of life and self-esteem [13, 14]. Due to various concerns, such as potential side effects and the fear of frequent injections among children and adolescents, complementary and alternative medical treatments are often sought to increase height growth [15]. Herbal medicine (HM) has been used to treat various diseases and is currently one of the most popular complementary and alternative medicines [16]. HM has been used for thousands of years in East Asia to treat growth disorders and SS. Previous studies used animal models to demonstrate that HM acted on different pathways from those targeted by GH by inducing the expression of IGF-1 and bone morphogenetic protein 2 and promoting longitudinal bone growth through cell proliferation in the epiphyseal plate [17, 18].

Systematic reviews on the treatment of SS primarily focused on the effects of GH [10, 19–21], and currently, investigations on the effects of HM are also being conducted [16, 22]. Several studies have been performed to determine the effects of combination therapy with HM and GH (CHG) for treating SS. However, currently, there is no review comparing the efficacy and safety of GH monotherapy (GHM) and CHG in patients with SS. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CHG compared to those of GHM in children with SS.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Protocol and Registration

The protocol of this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) platform, with the option to prospectively register a systematic review [23] (registration number: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/NMY5G). The protocol has been previously published [24].

2.2. Inclusion Criteria for Studies

2.2.1. Types of Studies

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of GHM and CHG in treating SS were included.

2.2.2. Participants

This study included children aged 0–18 years who exhibited decreased GV or were diagnosed with ISS according to the following diagnostic criteria: two or more SDs lower than the average height of an individual of the same age and sex, without identifiable deficiencies or disorders of GH.

2.2.3. Types of Interventions

In this review, we only included studies that compared CHG and GHM. The presentations of HM, such as decoction, capsules, tablets, pills, powders, and extracts, were not restricted. In addition, only HM prescribed by traditional East Asian medicine doctors was included in the study.

2.2.4. Outcomes

The primary outcome was an improvement in growth-related anthropometric indicators, such as PAH, GV, and SDs in height, and changes in growth-related hormones, such as IGF-1 and IGFBP-3. The secondary outcome was an improvement in height and weight. The incidence of adverse events (AE) during treatment was recorded.

2.3. Search Methods for the Identification of Studies

2.3.1. Electronic Searches

We searched Medline, EMBASE, Central, CINAHL, AMED, and the East Asian databases, such as OASIS, KTKP, KISS, KoreaMed, KMbase, RISS, DBPIA, CNKI, Wanfangdata, CQVIP, CiNii, and J-stage. All studies available in the respective databases, from inception to 1 April 2021, were included in the search strategy.

2.3.2. Search Strategy

The search terms and text words were: (“Short stature” [TIAB] OR “idiopathic short stature”[TIAB] OR “Growth disorder”[Mesh] OR “Dwarfism”[Mesh] OR “Failure to Thrive”[Mesh]) AND (“Herbal medicine”[Mesh] OR “Medicine, Korean Traditional”[Mesh] OR “Medicine, Chinese Traditional”[Mesh] OR “Medicine, Kampo”[Mesh] OR “Drug, Chinese Herbal”[Mesh] OR “Plant extract”[Mesh] OR “Plants, Medicinal”[Mesh] OR “traditional oriental medicine”[TIAB] OR “traditional Korean medicine”[TIAB] OR “traditional Chinese medicine”[TIAB] OR “kampo medicine”[TIAB] OR “herb”[TIAB]) AND (“Randomized Controlled Trial”[Publication Type] OR “Controlled clinical trial”[Publication Type] OR “randomized”[TIAB]). No language limitations were imposed. All details of the search strategy are described in the protocol article [24] and Supplementary Table 1.

2.4. Data Collection and Analysis

2.4.1. Study Selection

Two authors (SBS and JAL) independently performed the study selection. We excluded studies that did not fulfill the inclusion criteria (see Supplementary Table 2). Any disagreement was resolved through discussion and consensus with a third researcher (HLL). The selection process was recorded in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) flow diagram (Figure 1).

2.4.2. Data Extraction and Management

Two authors (SBS and HLA) independently performed data extraction using a data extraction form in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). In case of discrepancies, we rechecked the extracted data and attempted to resolve them through discussion. The unresolved issues after the discussion were referred to a third reviewer (HHL) for arbitration.

We extracted the following items: data for study identification (last name of the first author, publication year, and country); details of the participants (age, sex, height, and height percentile), sample size, the details of the interventions (treatment group, control group, duration of the intervention, and composition of HM, if possible), outcome measures, results, and AE. When data were missing in the reports, we contacted the corresponding author of the RCT for missing information.

2.4.3. Assessment of Risk of Bias in the Included Studies

Two researchers (SBS and HHL) assessed the risk of bias in the included studies according to the Cochrane Handbook criteria, version 5.2.0. We evaluated the following seven items: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other bias as “Low risk,” “High risk”, and “Unclear risk” [25].

2.4.4. Measures of Treatment Effect

We used relative risk (RR) to measure dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval (CI). If the studies presented results on different scales, we used the standard MD (SMD) with a 95% CI.

2.4.5. Assessment of Heterogeneity

Chi-squared and I² tests were used to test for heterogeneity, and I² > 50% indicated high heterogeneity. We performed meta-analyses using random- or fixed-effects models based on our analyses of the collected data. A fixed-effect model was used when no statistical heterogeneity was detected among the trials (I² < 50%). In contrast, a random-effects model was used if methodological heterogeneity was detected.

2.4.6. Data Synthesis

We conducted the review in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We performed analyses using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4 for Windows (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). We used GRADEpro software (McMaster University/Evidence Prime, Inc., Hamilton, Canada) to create a table summarising the findings. We assessed the primary and secondary outcomes, and -values ≤0.025 were considered statistically significant.

2.4.7. Assessment of Reporting Biases

Due to the small number of included studies, we did not generate funnel plots to detect reporting biases.

2.4.8. Subgroup Analysis and Sensitivity Analyses

Due to the small number of included studies, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses to explore the sources of potential heterogeneity were not performed.

3. Results

3.1. Description of the Included Studies

3.1.1. Results of the Search

We identified 356 studies by searching electronic databases (Figure 1). In the Korea and Japan databases, no studies met the inclusion criteria. After excluding 108 duplicates, 202 studies were screened by reading their titles and abstracts. A total of 46 studies were potentially relevant, and full texts were screened for further assessment. Finally, seven studies [26–32] were included in this review.

3.1.2. General Characteristics of Included Studies

All seven RCTs [26–32] were conducted in China and published between 2015 and 2020; all were published in Chinese. The included studies involved 455 participants with ISS, and the sample sizes ranged from 20 to 45 participants. All details of the general characteristics of the included studies are presented in Supplementary Table 3.

3.1.3. Risk of Bias in the Included Studies

We observed that many RCTs had an unclear risk of bias in certain domains because we could not obtain information from the articles. Detailed information is shown in the “Risk of bias” graph and the “Risk of bias” summary (Figures 2 and 3). All details on the risk of bias in the included studies are summarised in Supplementary Table 3.

3.1.4. Excluded Studies

We excluded 39 articles after careful examination of full-text copies. Common reasons for excluding studies were: no random allocation and HM monotherapy as the experimental intervention (see Supplementary Table 2).

3.2. Meta-Analysis Results

3.2.1. Predicted Adult Height

None of the seven RCTs provided data on the PAH.

3.2.2. Growth Velocity

Six of the seven included RCTs [27–32] comparing the GV exhibited significant heterogeneity in the data (, I² = 92%, Figure 4). Owing to this significant heterogeneity in comparison, a random-effects model was applied. The results of the random-effects model analysis confirmed that the experimental group showed significant improvements in GV compared with the control groups (MD = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.34–2.31, ).

3.2.3. SDs in Height

Two of the seven included RCTs [26,29] involving 128 participants were evaluated for the changes in SDs in height, with no significant heterogeneity in the data (p = 1.00, I² = 0%; Figure 5). The results of the fixed-effects model analysis combined with effect sizes confirmed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (MD = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.24–0.38, ), with the experimental group outperforming the control group.

3.2.4. Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1

Three of the seven included RCTs comparing IGF-1 showed no significant heterogeneity in the data [30–32] (p = 0.89, I² = 0%; Figure 6). The results of the fixed-effects model analysis combined with effect sizes indicated a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (MD = 61.85, 95% CI: 55.80–67.90, ), with the experimental group outperforming the control group.

3.2.5. Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3

Two of the seven included RCTs [30, 31] comparing IGFBP-3 showed no significant heterogeneity in the data (p = 0.28, I² = 13%, Figure 7). The results of fixed-effects model analysis combined with effect sizes confirmed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (SMD = 1.39, 95% CI: 0.93–1.85, ), with the experimental group outperforming the control group.

3.2.6. Adverse Events

Three of the seven included studies [29–31] comparing AEs showed no significant heterogeneity in the data (p = 0.77, I² = 0%; Figure 8). The results of fixed-effects model analysis combined with effect sizes indicated a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (RR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02–0.54, ). The experimental group had a significantly lower rate of AE than the control group.

3.3. Level of Evidence

The level of evidence is presented in Table 1. When comparing the CHG group with the GHM group, there was a “moderate” level of evidence for SDs in height [26, 29], weight (kg) [30,31], and IGFBP-3 (ng/mL) [30, 31] and “low” level of evidence for height (cm) [26, 27, 29–31], IGF-1 (ng/mL) [30–32], and AE [29–31]. The evidence level for GV (cm/year) [27–32] was “very low”. The low level of evidence was largely due to a high risk of bias, high heterogeneity, and overlap in the 95% CIs.

4. Discussion

This review provides a quantitative evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of CHG for treating SS by integrating outcomes from seven clinical RCTs involving 455 participants with ISS. The results of our analyses demonstrated that the efficacy of CHG was significantly better than that of GHM for treating SS. These results included significant improvements in GV, IGF-1, IGFBP-3, SDs in height, height, and weight, and a lower incidence rate of AEs in the CHG group than in the GHM group.

We could not perform meta-analyses for all our predefined outcomes because the data on PAH were not reported in any of the included RCTs. In Korea, PAH is often used as a primary indicator in height growth-related studies [22, 33]. Clinical RCTs using PAH as a major focus should be conducted in the future. If a meta-analysis on the change in PAH is conducted, the effect of CHG and GHM on height growth can be confirmed in more diverse ways.

The GV and SDs in height are critical evaluation indicators in height growth research and are used in many studies. However, due to the methodological limitations of clinical research, most studies did not reflect variations according to participants’ age or sexual maturity. Therefore, heterogeneity may have occurred in the interpretation of the results. In future clinical RCTs, it is necessary to address heterogeneity by varying recruitment according to children’s age or sexual maturity.

The results of these analyses indicated that CHG was effective in maintaining a low incidence of AE. Four cases of headache were reported in the GHM group and one in the CHG group. Two cases of obesity, three cases of redness and swelling at the injection site, and two cases of a decrease in serum T4 concentration were reported in the GHM group. The side effects of recombinant human GH therapy, currently used as a conventional treatment for ISS, may include injection site hematoma, pain, headache, scoliosis, glucose intolerance, and compromised cardiorespiratory functions [34, 35]. In two [30, 31] of the three studies [29–31] that reported AE, obesity, decrease in serum T4 concentration, and redness and swelling at the injection site were reported in the GHM group. In contrast, no AE was reported in the CHG group. Therefore, CHG is believed to mitigate the side effects; however, the clinical significance is limited.

4.1. Limitations

Overall, the evidence from the present review supports using CHG to treat children with SS. However, the RCTs included in this systematic review have several significant limitations.

First, all the research was conducted in China, which could be attributed to the widespread use of HM in Asian countries; however, it can be a potential bias factor. Explicit strategies, including databases from China, South Korea, and Japan, were designed to implement all available searches, but no search results were found. Furthermore, since our search was conducted until March 2021, further research related to our review may have been published, which could be included in future research.

Second, no negative results were reported and there may have been a reporting bias. Although publication bias could not be verified due to the small number of included studies, the fact that no negative results were reported may be considered a bias.

Third, the methodological quality of the included studies was low. None of the seven included studies reported blinding of participants and personnel, and only one study reported allocation concealment. In addition, no studies used the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) checklist.

Fourth, there was a limitation in increasing the research heterogeneity and reducing reliability. The intervention dosage was not specified, the long-term follow-ups were not performed, and variables that significantly impacted results, such as participants’ age or sexual maturity, were not controlled.

Finally, none of the included studies suggested the mechanisms underlying the synergistic effect exhibited by GH and HM. This makes it difficult to judge the clinical significance of the combination therapy.

4.2. Implications for Practice

The results of this study suggest that CHG has a positive effect in treating SS compared to GHM. As a viable and integrated approach to treating SS, CHG can be used as an effective complementary and alternative medical treatment option in combination with conventional GH therapy. Therefore, in clinical practice, more integrated treatment approaches are required to improve the effectiveness of treatment.

4.3. Implications for Research

The literature included in this systematic review had poor methodological quality, resulting in a reduced recommendation grade and level of evidence for systematic evaluation. Therefore, future clinical research should be conducted while considering the following factors:(1)In compliance with the CONSORT checklist, randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding should be described in detail.(2)Methodological standardization of RCT evaluation related to composition, dosage, and usage of HM therapy is required.(3)In research on childhood growth, the heterogeneity of results should be addressed by considering the participants’ age and sexual maturity when recruiting.(4)In many countries, well-designed, large-scale, high-quality, multicentre RCTs are necessary for a more reliable research evaluation.

5. Conclusion

CHG provided significant improvements in GV and changes in SDs in height compared to GHM, maintaining a low incidence of AE. Therefore, we can assume that HM can help improve the effectiveness of GH and reduce the side effects. Despite these benefits, there are some limitations, such as the poor methodological quality of the analyzed studies and the high heterogeneity of the results. Furthermore, a definite mechanism through which GH and HM synergistically improve height growth has not yet been described. Before CHG is accepted as an evidence-based treatment option in clinical practice, more methodologically improved research data are required.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article as supplementary tables.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors made a substantial contribution to this work. HLL, SBS, HLA, and JAL developed the review protocol. HLL and JAL contributed to the conception and design of the review. SBS and JAL read and screened abstracts and titles of potentially relevant studies. SBS and HLA were responsible for extracting data. SBS and HHL were responsible for rating the quality of the papers. SBS drafted the manuscript. JAL and HLL critically reviewed the draft and suggested amendments before submission.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Editage (https://www.editage.co.kr/) for English language editing. This work was supported by the Traditional Korean Medicine R&D Program, funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) (Grant number HF20C0183), and the INNOPOLIS foundation funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (Grant number 2020-DD-RD-0413).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1. Details of search strategy; Supplementary Table 2. List of excluded studies; Supplementary Table 3. Characteristics of included studies. (Supplementary Materials)

References

M. B. Ranke, “Towards a consensus on the definition of idiopathic short stature,” Hormone Research, vol. 45, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Pedicelli, E. Peschiaroli, E. Violi, and S. Cianfarani, “Controversies in the definition and treatment of idiopathic short stature (ISS),” Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology, vol. 1, pp. 105–115, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
D. E. Sandberg and M. Gardner, “Short stature,” Pediatric Clinics of North America, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 963–982, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Backeljauw, M. Cappa, W. Kiess et al., “Impact of short stature on quality of life: a systematic literature review,” Growth Hormone & IGF Research, vol. 57-58, Article ID 101392, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. G. Wheeler, K. Bresnahan, B. A. Shephard, J. Lau, and E. M. Balk, “Short stature and functional impairment: a systematic review,” Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, vol. 158, no. 3, pp. 236–243, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Zlotkin and S. K. Varma, “Psychosocial effects of short stature,” Indian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 79-80, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Cuttler and J. B. Silvers, “Growth hormone and health policy,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 3149–3153, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kang, Y. Choi, I. Choi, H. S. Kim, and D. H. Kim, “The effect of growth hormone on patients with growth hormone deficiency and idiopathic short stature,” Korean Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 47, pp. 310–318, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Lee and H. Han, “Effects of growth hormone therapy in children with idiopathic short stature,” Korean Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 48, pp. 865–870, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Paltoglou, I. Dimitropoulos, G. Kourlaba, and E. Charmandari, “The effect of treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) on linear growth and adult height in children with idiopathic short stature (ISS): a systematic review and meta–analysis,” Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1577–1588, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Kim, H. R. Chung, Y. A. Lee et al., “Growth responses to growth hormone therapy in children with attenuated growth who showed normal growth hormone response to stimulation tests,” Korean Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 922–929, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Lee, “Growth hormone therapy in short stature children,” Journal of the Korean Medical Association, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 849–855, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. C. Theunissen, G. A. Kamp, H. M. Koopman, K. A. Zwinderman, T. Vogels, and J. M. Wit, “Quality of life and self–esteem in children treated for idiopathic short stature,” The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 507–515, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Huh and M. J. Park, “Questionnaire–based analysis of growth–promoting attempts among children visiting a university growth clinic,” Korean Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 576–580, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Choi and E. Park, “A clinical study of the pediatric patients who visited oriental medical Hospital for Growth Treatment,” Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine, vol. 32, pp. 51–62, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Lee, C. Y. Kwon, and S. Jang, “Comparative effectiveness of east Asian traditional medicine for treatment of idiopathic short stature in children: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis,” Medicine (Baltimore), vol. 99, no. 43, Article ID e22856, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Kim, M. Song, D. Lee et al., “Effect of HT042, herbal formula, on longitudinal bone growth in spontaneous dwarf rats,” Molecules, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 13271–13282, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Cho, S. H. Lee, D. Lee et al., “The Korean herbal formulation Yukmijihwangtang stimulates longitudinal bone growth in animal models,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 239, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Loftus, R. Heatley, C. Walsh, and P. Dimitri, “Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of Genotropin (somatropin) in children with short stature,” Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism: Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 535–551, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yang, X. Bai, X. Yuan et al., “Efficacy and safety of long–acting growth hormone in children with short stature: a systematic review and meta–analysis,” Endocrine, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bryant, L. Baxter, C. B. Cave, and R. Milne, “Recombinant growth hormone for idiopathic short stature in children and adolescents,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 18, no. 3, Article ID CD004440, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kweon, S. Cho, and S. Yu, “Review of clinical researches for herbal medicine treatment in pediatric growth – focusing on recent national studies,” Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine, vol. 32, pp. 103–112, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Pieper and T. Rombey, “Where to prospectively register a systematic review,” Systematic Reviews, vol. 11, p. 8, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. Shim, H. R. Ahn, J. A. Lee, and H. L. Lee, “Comparative effectiveness and safety of growth hormone monotherapy and combination therapy with herbal medicine and growth hormone in short stature children; A protocol for systematic review and meta–analysis,” Medicine (Baltimore): Case Reports and Study Protocols, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. e0104–4, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Higgins, R. Churchill, and J. Chandler, “Chapter 8. Assessing risk of bias in included studies,” Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 520 (Updated June 2017), John Wiley & Sons, Newyork, NY, USA, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Kong, “Clinical effect of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine on children with idiopathic short stature,” Cap Food Med, vol. 26, pp. 35-36, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Qiu, “The clinical observation of the jianpi yishen party joint growth hormone for the treatment of dwarfism children,” Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China, 2017, Master’s thesis.
View at: Google Scholar
S. K. Wang and B. Feng, “Liu–jun–zi decoction and recombinant human growth hormones for the treatment of idiopathic short stature,” Henan Med Res, vol. 29, pp. 4936–4938, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Tian and Yh Zeng, “Analysis of short–term curative effect of 35 cases of idiopathic short stature treat with the combination of Chinese and Western medicine,” Journal of Pediatrics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 13, pp. 39–43, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Cui, W. Yu, and W. Liang, “Clinical study of spleen deficiency–decoction and growth hormone for the treatment of idiopathic dwarfism,” Psychological Documents, vol. 22, pp. 61-62, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Hao, “Effect of Jianpi Yishen therapy combined with recombinant human growth hormone on the treatment of idiopathic short stature and its effect on serum IGF–1 and IGFBP–3 expression,” Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, vol. 24, pp. 2900–2902, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Zhang, “To explore the treatment of idiopathic short stature with TCM–WM and gene of ISS,” Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China, 2017, Master’s thesis.
View at: Google Scholar
E. J. Kim, Y. J. Lim, H. S. Lee, and J. S. Hwang, “The effect of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and growth hormone on predicted adult height in girls with precocious puberty,” Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 12, pp. 111–118, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
P. M. Wolfgram, A. L. Carrel, and D. B. Allen, “Long–term effects of recombinant human growth hormone therapy in children with Prader–Willi syndrome,” Current Opinion in Pediatrics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 509–514, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Coutant, J. Bosch Muñoz, C. P. Dumitrescu et al., “Effectiveness and overall safety of NutropinAq® for growth hormone deficiency and other paediatric growth hormone disorders: completion of the International Cooperative Growth Study, NutropinAq® European Registry (iNCGS),” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 12, Article ID 676083, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Soo Bo Shim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies