Review Article

Evidence Quality Assessment of Tai Chi Exercise Intervention in Cognitive Impairment: An Overview of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 6

Results of evidence quality.

Author, year (country)OutcomesStudies (participants)LimitationsInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionPublication biasRelative effect (95% CI)Heterogeneity (%)Quality

Liu et al., 2021 (China) [27]MoCA (global cognitive function)5 (344)0 (1)−1 (2)0−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 3.23, 95% CI (1.88, 4.58)I2 = 92Very low
MMSE (global cognitive function)3 (187)0−1 (2)0−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 3.69, 95% CI (0.31, 7.08)I2 = 83Very low
TMT-B (executive function)2 (147)000−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = −13.69, 95% CI (−21.64, −5.74)I2 = 0Low
Yang et al., 2020 (China) [28]Global cognitive function5 (858)0−1 (2)00−1 (4)SMD = 0.40, 95% CI (0.24, 0.55)I2 = 63Low
Memory and learning7 (855)0−1 (2)00−1 (4)SMD = 0.37, 95% CI (0.24, 0.51)I2 = 67Low
Mental speed and attention6 (929)0−1 (2)00−1 (4)SMD = 0.51, 95% CI (0.31, 0.71)I2 = 84Low
Ideas, abstraction, figural creations, and mental flexibility6 (782)0000−1 (4)SMD = 0.29, 95% CI (0.16, 0.42)I2 = 0Moderate
Visuospatial ability3 (192)000−1 (3)−1 (4)SMD = 0.29, 95% CI (0.10, 0.48)I2 = 0Low
Gu et al., 2021 (China) [29]MMSE (global cognitive function)6 (673)−1 (1)−1 (2)00−1 (4)WMD = 1.52, 95% CI (0.90, 2.14)I2 = 63Very low
MoCA (global cognitive function)3 (244)−1 (1)−1 (2)0−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 3.5, 95% CI (0.76, 6.24)I2 = 92Very low
CDR (global cognitive function)2 (285)−1 (1)00−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = −0.55, 95% CI (−0.80, −0.29)I2 = 0Very low
LMD (memory and learning)3 (435)−1 (1)−1 (2)00−1 (4)WMD = 1.10, 95% CI (0.04, 2.16)I2 = 77Very low
DSF (executive function)2 (287)−1 (1)−1 (2)0−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 0.53, 95% CI (−0.65, 1.71)I2 = 64Very low
DSB (executive function)2 (287)−1 (1)00−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = −0.1, 95% CI (−0.38, 0.19)I2 = 0Very low
Lin et al., 2021 (China) [30]Global cognitive function2 (272)0000−1 (4)WMD = -2.24, 95% CI (−3.51, −0.97)I2 = 0Moderate
Memory and learning3 (126)0−1 (2)0−1 (3)−1 (4)SMD = 0.83, 95% CI (0.22, 1.45)I2 = 57Very low
Visuospatial ability2 (85)000−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 3.15, 95% CI (0.74, 5.56)I2 = 0Low
Executive function3 (376)000−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 0.32, 95% CI (0.03, 0.61)I2 = 0Low
Physical activity2 (53)000−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 18.78, 95% CI (10.80, 26.76)I2 = 0Low
Psychological assessment2 (272)000−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 0.17, 95% CI (−0.62, 0.96)I2 = 0Low
Cai et al., 2020 (China) [31]Global cognitive function12 (1,738)0−1 (2)000SMD = 0.41, 95% CI (0.33, 0.48)I2 = 67Moderate
Memory function16 (1,708)0−1 (2)000SMD = 0.31, 95% CI (0.22, 0.39)I2 = 69Moderate
Executive function9 (1,586)0−1 (2)000SMD = 0.33, 95% CI (0.25, 0.42)I2 = 77Moderate
Verbal fluency5 (1,325)00000SMD = 0.27, 95% CI (0.13, 0.41)I2 = 0High
Attention6 (1,479)0−1 (2)000SMD = 0.25, 95% CI (0.17, 0.34)I2 = 96Moderate
Visual space function3 (192)0−1 (2)0−1 (3)0SMD = 0.03, 95% CI (−0.28, 0.33)I2 = 55Low
Li et al., 2021 (China) [32]GDS (psychological assessment)2 (110)−1 (1)00−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = −2.81, 95% CI (−3.48, −2.14)I2 = 45Very low
DSF (executive function)2 (355)0−1 (2)0−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 1.22, 95% CI (−0.68, 3.12)I2 = 82Very low
DSB (executive function)3 (620)000−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 0.17, 95% CI (−0.03, 0.36)I2 = 18Low
MoCA (global cognitive function)2 (136)−1 (1)−1 (2)0−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = -1.58, 95% CI (−9.79, 6.64)I2 = 97Very low
AVLT (memory and learning)2 (123)−1 (1)−1 (2)0−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 1.27,95% CI (0.31, 2.23)I2 = 51Very low
LMD (memory and learning)3 (660)0−1 (4)00−1 (4)WMD = 2.26, 95% CI (0.35, 4.16)I2 = 93Low
MMSE (global cognitive function)4 (704)0000−1 (4)WMD = 0.93, 95% CI (0.40, 1.47)I2 = 0Moderate
Zhang et al., 2017 (China) [33]Global cognitive function3 (678)−1 (1)000−1 (4)WMD = 0.91, 95% CI (0.37, 1.46)I2 = 0Low
Verbal fluency2 (654)−1 (1)000−1 (4)WMD = 2.17, 95% CI (0.88, 3.45)I2 = 0Low
Memory function2 (654)−1 (1)−1 (2)0−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 0.16, 95% CI (−0.14, 0.45)I2 = 55Very low
Zhang et al., 2020 (China) [34]Global cognitive function5 (785)000−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 0.29, 95% CI (−0.16, 0.74)I2 = 0Low
Memory function4 (726)0000−1 (4)WMD = 0.37, 95% CI (0.13, 0.61)I2 = 7Moderate
Executive function4 (726)000−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 0.03, 95% CI (−0.16, 0.22)I2 = 0Low
Verbal fluency2 (594)000−1 (3)−1 (4)WMD = 0.47, 95% CI (−0.76, 1.70)I2 = 0Low
Visual space function4 (726)0−1 (2)00−1 (4)SMD = 0.57, 95% CI (0.23, 0.91)I2 = 75Low
Psychological assessment4 (730)000−1 (3)−1 (4)SMD = 0.00, 95% CI (−0.14, 0.15)I2 = 0Low

Note. (1) The included studies had a large bias in methodology such as randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding. (2) The confidence interval overlapped less or the I2 value of the combined results was larger. (3) The sample size from the included studies did not meet the optimal sample size or the 95% confidence interval crossed the invalid line. (4) The funnel chart was asymmetry. The 95% confidence interval did not cross the invalid line. MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale; MMSE, mini-mental state examination; TMT-B, trail marking test B; CDR, clinical dementia rating; DSF, digit span forward; DSB, digit span backward; LMD, Logical Memory Delayed Recall Score; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; AVLT, auditory verbal learning test.