Research Article
Deep Learning Based Tongue Prickles Detection in Traditional Chinese Medicine
Table 4
Prickle detection results and comparison with previous studies.
| Method | Recall | Accuracy | Root & center (%) | Tip (%) | Margin (%) | Total (%) | Total (%) |
| LOG [7] | 84.97 | 67.37 | 84.23 | 86.95 | — | SVM [5] | — | — | — | 89.90 | — | YOLO [28] | 73.28 | 67.68 | 65.48 | 67.95 | 60.44 | Vanilla faster-RCNN [26] | 69.43 | 66.48 | 61.22 | 65.58 | 72.13 | Ours w/o segmentation | 88.89 | 89.45 | 83.34 | 89.77 | 86.69 | Ours | 98.62 | 89.92 | 94.59 | 92.42 | 88.46 |
|
|