Research Article
Treatment of Liver Fibrosis after Hepatitis B with TCM Combined with NAs Evaluated by Noninvasive Diagnostic Methods: A Retrospective Study
Table 3
Comparison of four items of the liver fiber before treatment [M (P25–P75)].
| Years | Groups | HA (ng/ml) | PCIII (ng/ml) | CIV (ng/ml) | LN (ng/ml) |
| 0 | TCM users | 83.40 (57.40–206.30) | 13.90 (6.40–41.75) | 62.50 (43.80–69.35) | 78.50 (44.55–114.20) | TCM nonusers | 118.70 (64.20–194.95) | 9.70 (6.05–23.95) | 65.60 (33.20–100.90) | 79.10 (46.30–106.90) | value | 0.240 | 0.612 | 0.228 | 0.741 |
| 1 | TCM users | 89.60 (62.05–176.05) | 6.70 (5.00–23.65) | 58.40 (41.65–70.85) | 68.40 (40.72–100.60) | TCM nonusers | 160.90 (89.10–268.35) | 8.30 (5.15–55.60) | 63.20 (31.40–118.95) | 58.80 (38.00–88.25) | value | 0.190 | 0.172 | 0.071 | 0.096 |
| 2 | TCM users | 114.50 (95.70–129.40) | 12.30 (5.80–43.85) | 48.10 (35.20–69.60) | 67.30 (44.70–96.48) | TCM nonusers | 131.20 (116.70–144.00) | 7.30 (5.10–18.90) | 47.70 (33.70–64.05) | 57.90 (35.85–98.1) | value | 0.442 | 0.154 | 0.001 | 0.655 |
| 3 | TCM users | 77.10 (63.15–87.00) | 9.00 (5.45–18.20) | 35.30 (20.40–35.30) | 36.44 (24.15–52.98) | TCM nonusers | 130.10 (119.30–149.25) | 6.90 (4.30–13.45) | 40.01 (23.40–91.90) | 50.50 (22.60–77.79) | value | 0.084 | 0.131 | 0.000 | 0.228 |
| 4 | TCM users | 60.90 (58.45–97.50) | 13.90(5.50–18.60) | 26.90(16.85–44.45) | 23.50 (15.10–57.05) | TCM nonusers | 124.40 (114.45–137.20) | 12.30 (5.20–18.30) | 36.80 (19.55–92.55) | 34.80 (22.55–54.20) | value | 0.020 | 0.499 | 0.000 | 0.208 |
| 5 | TCM users | 67.10 (58.95–96.50)△ | 10.10 (5.25-17.20) | 24.90 (14.90–35.20)△ | 39.50 (22.35–72.90) | TCM nonusers | 106.00 (69.9–170.25) | 12.40 (6.45–19.55) | 32.80 (19.10–71.45) | 39.50 (22.35–72.90) | value | 0.008 | 0.207 | 0.001 | 0.053 |
|
|
Note. Compared with that before treatment (0 year) in this group, ; compared with the TCM nonusers after treatment, △. |