Research Article

Efficacy of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Intermittent Hemodialysis in Patients with Renal Failure in Intensive Care Unit: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of included studies.

StudyStudy typeNAge Sex (F%)DiseaseDesignPrimary outcomeSecondary outcomeRisk

John, 2001, GermanyRCT3061 23%ARFIHD (lasting 3-4 h with blood flow rate 200-250 mL/min and dialysate flow rate 500 mL/min); n = 20
CVVH (18 mL/kg/h, and then 35 mL/kg/h) + Heparin; n = 10
In contrast to IHD, CVVH caused a decrease in heart rate (−3 (11) vs. 9 (8)/min, )) and an increase in systolic blood pressure (12 (1) vs. −5 (17) mmHg, ) after 2 hAfter 24 h, increased systemic vascular resistance was found in the CVVH vs. IHD group (312 (755) vs. −29 (89) dyne/cm5, ) and there was a decrease in cardiac output (−1.54 (1.4) vs. −0.25 (0.91/min, )L

Mehta, 2001, USRCT16661 24%ARFIHD (flow rates of 500 mL/min, and blood flow rates of 200 to 300 mL/min, 2 sections, 3-4 h) + Heparin; n = 82
CAVHDF (blood flow rates of 100 mL/min, dialysate flow rates of 16.7 mL/min, and ultrafiltration rates of 400 to 800 mL/hour, >25 h) + Heparin; n = 84
The adjusted odds of death associated with CRRT was 1.58 (95% CI 0.7 to 3.3); overall, 36.6% patients (70.7% of those who survived) had a complete recovery of renal function, and there was no difference between the two groups (34.9% in CRRT vs. 33.3% in IHD, )Days in ICU:(CRRT 15.1 vs. IHD 16.7 days, ). Days in hospital were significantly reduced for patients who received CRRT as the initial therapy only (CRRT 17.1 vs. IHD 26.3 days, )M

Gasparovic, 2003, CroatiaRCT104NRARFIHD (lasting 3-4 h with blood flow rate 200-250 mL/min and dialysate flow rate 500 mL/min); n = 52
CVVH (18–35 mL/kg/h) + Heparin; n = 52
In the IHD group, survivors are 21; in the CRRT group, survivors are 15. There was no difference in total survival rate between the two groupsThere were no differences between the groups in extracorporeal procedureH

Augustine, 2004, USRCT8061 32%ARFIHD (3 treatments weekly using a blood flow rate of 300 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 500 mL/min) + Heparin; n = 40
CVVH (a blood flow rate of 200 mL/min) + Heparin; n = 40
There were no differences in survival or renal recovery between the groups. In patients who died, mean survival time was 10.7 (11.2) days for the IHD group versus 14.3 (16.1) days for the CVVH groupDeath occurred in 27 CVVH patients (67.5%) versus 28 IHD patients (70%; =NS). Five patients on CVVH had renal recovery versus 4 on IHD ()M

Uehlinger, 2005, SwitzerlandRCT12567 31%ARFIHD (blood flow ranged from 150 to 350 ml/min, lasted from 3 to 4 h); n = 55
CVVH (blood flow ranged from 100 to 180 ml/min + heparin); n = 70
Mortality rates in the hospital (47 vs. 51%, CVVH vs. IHD, ) or in the ICU (34 vs. 38%, ). The percentage of patients with full recovery of renal function was 50% in the CVVH and 42% in the IHD group ()Hospital length of stay in the survivors on CVVH [20 (6-71) days] and in those on IHD [30 (2-89) days, ]. SCr: IHD 153 (59-496) vs. CVVH 121 (72-242) μmol/LM

Noble, 2006, UKRCT11753 29%ARFIHD (4 h daily with a cuprophane membrane and heparin); n = 53
CHDF (a biocompatible membrane and prostacyclin in addition to heparin, 30 h); n = 64
There was no difference in ICU mortality (73.5% [39/53] IHD vs. 71.8% [46/64] CHDF, ) or hospital mortality (83%[44/53] IHD vs. 76.5% [49/64] CHDF, ) between the two RRT treatment groupsSCr: IHD 412.5 (70-966) vs. CHDF 345 (70-2240) μmol/L; renal function at RRT initiation SCr: IHD 595 (260-1650) vs. CHDF 570 (200-2270)M

Vinsonneau, 2006, FranceRCT36065 27%ARFIHD (blood flow of 250 mL/min or more and dialysate flow set at 500 mL/min, 5.2 h); n = 184
CVVH (blood flow of 120 mL/min, dialysate flow of 500 mL/h, and ultrafiltration flow of 1000 mL/h); n = 175
Rate of survival at 60-days did not differ between the groups (32% in the intermittent hemodialysis group versus 33% in the continuous renal replacement therapy group (95% CI −8·8 to 11·1,), or at any other timeDays in ICU: IHD 20 (16-23) vs. CRRT 19 (15-22); days in hospital: 30 (24-35) vs. 32 (22-42) SCr: IHD 2.18 (1.8) vs. CVVH 2.12 (1.7) mg/dlL

Lins, 2009, BelgiumRCT31666 41%AKIIRRT (4-6 h per session with a blood flow of 100-300 mL/min and a dialysate flow of 300-500 mL/min, 4 h); n = 144
CRRT (CVVH a blood flow rate of 100-250 mL/min and an ultrafiltration rate of 1-2 L/h, 4d) + anticoagulation; n = 172
A mortality of 62.5% in IRRT compared to 58.1% in CRRT. Days in ICU: 17.2 (18.7) vs. 18.7 (19.0); days in hospital: 31.4 (29.7) vs. 36.8 (31.0)Mean SCr was 3.6 mg/dL in IRRT and 3.4 mg/dL in CRRT patientsM

Schefold, 2014, GermanyRCT25262 37%ARFIHD (4 hours of hemodialysis at a blood flow of 200 to 250 ml/min); n = 129
CVVH (24 hours daily by using a polysulfone synthetic membrane, blood flow of 200 ml/min); n = 123
Survival rates at 14 days after RRT were 39.5% (IHD) versus 43.9% (CVVH) (odds ratio (OR), 0.84; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.41; ). 14 day-, 30-day, and all-cause intrahospital mortality rates were not different between the two groupsDays in ICU: IHD 25.2 (40.1) vs. CVVH 22.3 (26.1); days in hospital: 33.9 (49.3) vs. 32.4 (37.4) SCr: IHD 4.7 (0.8-10.9) vs. CVVH 3.9 (0.8-25.3) mg/dlM

Dai, 2016, ChinaRCT7359 40%AKIIHD (blood flow of 150-200 mL/min or more and dialysate flow set at 500-1000 mL/min, 4 h) + heparin; n = 38
CVVH (blood flow of 150-200 mL/min and dialysate flow of 200-300 mL/h, 8-10 h) + heparin; n = 35
One week after treatment, compared to the IHD group, CRRT could dramatically reduce the levels of CRP (mg/L: 41.05 ± 10.15 vs. 60.21 ± 14.78, t = 6.401, ), SCr (μmol/L: 185.97 ± 65.48 vs. 232.02 ± 71.93, ), and urine output recovery time (days: 7.94 ± 3.06 vs. 11.08 ± 3.71, )Length of ICU stay (days: 9.54 ± 3.39 vs. 13.42 ± 3.89, t = 4.521, ), organ support time (days: 3.23 ± 2.70 vs. 6.34 ± 3.36, t = 4.343, ), and the incidence of cardiovascular events (23.53% (8/35) vs. 39.47% (15/38), χ2 = 5.509, )L

Hou, 2021, ChinaRCT12055 28%AKIIHD (blood flow of 220-250 mL/min and dialysate flow set at 500 mL/min, 6 h) + heparin; n = 60 CVVH (blood flow of 120-200 mL/min and dialysate flow of 25-45 mL/kg/h, 24 h) + heparin; n = 60In the patients treated with CRRT, the levels of SCr, blood urea nitrogen, and blood lactic acid were all lower than those in the control group (all )The time of staying in ICU, the period of oliguria, the time of renal replacement therapy, the time of staying in hospital, and the experimental group were all shorter than the control group (all )M

Acute kidney injury (AKI); acute renal failure (ARF); continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration (CAVH); continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration with dialysis (CAVHD); continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration (CAVHDF); continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration (CAVHF); Continuous hemodialysis with ultrafiltration (CHDF); continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH); continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); intermittent hemodialysis (IHD); intermittent renal replacement therapy (IRRT); randomized clinical trial (RCT); serum creatinine (SCr).