Perceptions of Residents on the Microlearning Environment in Postgraduate Clinical Training

Table 2

Genderwise and overall scores on the HEMLEM tool.

Items	Male	Female	Overall	value
	Mean ± SD	Mean ± SD	Mean ± SD
(1) This placement had a welcoming, friendly, and open atmosphere	4.06 ± 1.22	4.23 ± 1.01	4.17 ± 1.09	0.41
(2) There was a culture where I felt free to ask questions or make comments on this placement	4.17 ± 0.93	4.12 ± 1.14	4.13 ± 1.04	0.75
(3) Staff on this placement were enthusiastic about teaching	3.92 ± 1.05	4.14 ± 0.94	4.06 ± 0.98	0.21
(4) My supervisor showed an interest in me	3.92 ± 1.25	4.18 ± 1.12	4.08 ± 1.16	0.22
(5) My input was valued on this placement	4.17 ± 0.95	4.01 ± 1.05	4.10 ± 1.01	0.39
(6) I was provided with regular, useful, and supportive feedback during this placement	3.85 ± 0.98	3.93 ± 0.97	3.91 ± 0.97	0.66
(7) I had the opportunity to apply my previous knowledge in this placement	4.29 ± 1.03	4.43 ± 0.7	4.38 ± 0.84	0.38
(8) My knowledge and skills were developed on this placement	4.33 ± 0.91	4.64 ± 0.72	4.54 ± 0.8	0.04∗
(9) This placement helped me put theory into practice	4.31 ± 0.82	4.22 ± 0.98	4.27 ± 0.92	0.57
(10) I was able to meet my learning objectives on this placement	4.17 ± 1.09	3.94 ± 0.94	3.85 ± 0.99	0.38
(11) I had the opportunity to deal with the patient as a whole on this placement	4.67 ± 0.78	4.48 ± 1.01	4.59 ± 0.92	0.32
(12) I was given tasks suitable for my stage of training on this placement	4.17 ± 1.02	4.10 ± 1.06	4.14 ± 1.04	0.75
Subscale 1: staff attitudes and behaviors	24.15 ± 4.93	24.59 ± 4.93	24.38 ± 4.92	0.57
Subscale 2: teaching quality	25.88 ± 4.01	25.83 ± 3.92	25.83 ± 3.94	0.95
Overall HEMLEM score	50.03 ± 8.06	50.42 ± 7.87	50.21 ± 7.91	0.75