Quality Assessment of YouTube Contents regarding Hydroponic Technology

<table class="table-group" id="tab3"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="1"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">(A) Hydroponic technology aspect (scoring range: 0 to 10)</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Introduction</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Necessary instruments</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Nutrition management</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Management of pest</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Harvesting of hydroponic produce</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Suitability of different hydroponic systems</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Management cost</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Water management</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Management of waste</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Precautionary measures</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">(B) Technical aspect (scoring range: 0 to 5)</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Video resolution at least 720p</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Subtitle is present on the video</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Audio of the content is clear</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Completely focused and stable</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Relevant audio and video clips are used</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">(C) Comprehensive aspect (scoring range: 0 to 5)</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Whole content is easily understandable</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Content fulfill its’ objectives</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Content discussion is on point</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Content publisher is reliable</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"> Content provided additional resources</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="1"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Customized content scoring process.</div>

Education Research International

tab3

Table 3

Table 3: Quality Assessment of YouTube Contents regarding Hydroponic Technology 